Talk:Special Forces Command (Cambodia)

Removal of copyvio template

Amortias, Ʋaaŋsieŋsaroeung: A bot has tagged this article as a possible copyright violation, and offered a link to a detailed report. Instead of WP:EDITWARRING, might someone consider posting their evaluation of that copyvio report on this talk page, as suggested by the template? Oh, and I think you're each at the WP:3RR limit, so there's time to talk about it.
 Unician ∇  14:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Unician. My reason for the readdition of the WP:COPYVIO tags was my intrepretation of the vandalism policy regarding the removal of policy tags. I had reviewed the suspected copyvio and there was a very high likelyhood of this being a copyright issue. From WP:VANDALISM the abuse of tags section does state that the removal of policy tags is considered vandalism so this would fall outside of teh 3RR policy. From previous experience once a copyvio tag is on a page its normally dealt with quite quicly by administrators. I noted that after my last revert the user did remove the copyrighted material of their own volition otherwise I would have taken it to discussion then raised it as a potential vandlaism issue. Amortias (T)(C) 19:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Great, glad to hear that all is now stable.

Ʋaaŋsieŋsaroeung, thanks for creating this article! May I offer some friendly encouragement to take advantage of the free edit summary feature, WP:EDS? If you mention what you're trying to accomplish with each edit, other editors might be able to provide assistance or advice, especially if you are having some difficulty in reaching your goals (as it seemed here), whether for technical, policy, or other reasons. Those edit insights may not be at all obvious to someone (like me!) who doesn't know as much about the subject of the article as you do.  Unician ∇  11:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 911 Special Forces Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216032756/http://www.mond.gov.kh/ to http://www.mond.gov.kh/

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071029155147/http://www.gun-world.net/china/rifle/qbz97/qbz97.htm to http://www.gun-world.net/china/rifle/qbz97/qbz97.htm

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

See above.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)