Talk:SpaceX Dragon 2
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SpaceX Dragon 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roscosmos to enter into barter system with crew dragon flights
editDon't want to discuss anything but telling to be keep eyes for a cheerful moment for this page possible Russian cosmonaut to be announced tomorrow. Happening just like soyuz missions. Possible candidates are crew 4 with less time spent in training or crew 5 with much training Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Was ballast sled built and used - What mass, distance
editArticle says ballast sled added to design by SpaceX (with ref to Feb 2015 congressional testimony) - but did it ever get built and flown ? When was it cancelled ? Why ? What mass, travel, direction etc would it have had ? - Rod57 (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- The ballast sled was not implemented (along with the landing legs). It would have been used for precision land landings without using the parachutes. SpaceX removed the ability to land propulsively because of the development and testing time. Crew Dragon only lands by water splashdown. No showbiz mike (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Here is a NASA document that includes a Crew-2 capsule subassembly listing that doesn't mention a ballast sled system. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nac_ccp_status_dec_6_2018_non-sbutagged.pdf No showbiz mike (talk) 14:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. A very interesting presentation, including the capsule assembly timelines & diagrams. - Rod57 (talk) 09:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Could have more details on pressure vessel and service structure in capsule
editCould have more details on pressure vessel and service structure in capsule, including details of propellant and life support systems. (more detailed than [1]) - Rod57 (talk) 09:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Moon
editCould this vehicle fly to the Moon? 2001:9E8:CADA:DF00:144E:183C:F952:F358 (talk) 19:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)