WikiProject Time assessment rating comment

edit

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
Yamara 15:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit

Has anybody ever seen such a colour coded five-day calendar?--145.254.156.95 18:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Big chunk of info lost

edit

Joe Kress ,

During the rewrite you have lost time period 1918--1929. Please restore. `'Míkka>t 02:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The part of the old article which originally discussed the adoption of the Gregorian calendar is at the beginning of the section Soviet calendar#Gregorian calendar. Nothing else about the period 1918–1929 appeared in the original article—nevertheless, I added significant information about the national holidays during that period in Soviet calendar#National holidays. — Joe Kress (talk) 03:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Soviet calendar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dr Zhivago

edit

In the novel he mentions his "nine days of work and his one day of rest", implying a ten day work week. The author seemed to think this was commonly understood and needed no explanation, there was not even a footnote for Western readers, which had been included on other Soviet topics that might be unfamiliar to them. 2600:1000:B162:36B8:0:6F:EF39:5201 (talk) 22:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The top of the article literally has no external sources

edit

The top of the article literally has no external sources. Brauxljo (talk) 17:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Erroneous reporting of '30-day months' is an opinion

edit

This section should be headed and the lede phrased in a way to present the conflict among sources, not to proclaim which are factually correct and which are in error. 2001:5A8:4615:6B00:A0A6:7402:B669:676 (talk) 22:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is no "conflict among sources". There was no '30-day months'. Whoever reported those, were misguided. - Altenmann >talk 23:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply