Talk:Sony Alpha 230

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to Sony Alpha 230 - I'll have a look at the others... Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sony a230 → Sony α 230 — Naming consistency with other Sony α cameras. Apalsola ^{t • c} 14:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oh the can o' worms that has been opened. Oppose per WP:MOSTM. Title should be Sony a230 or Sony Alpha 230. All others should be moved too. — AjaxSmack 00:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oppose all of them should be renamed to Sony Alpha xxx per MOS:TM. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oppose per above, specifically the WP:MOSTM bullet point stating: "Avoid using special characters that are not pronounced, are included purely for decoration, or simply substitute for English words". cab (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Moving all the other articles is fine, too. My point was that the naming should be consistent. I vote for Sony Alpha xxx style naming. --Apalsola ^{t • c} 12:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am of the exact same position as AjaxSmack. Sony a230 or Sony Alpha 230 and the closing admin should take care to ensure that all the Sony alpha cameras are moved as everyone appears to agree that it should remain consistent.--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Weak flash edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Standard" yes, but it has been downgraded from earlier standards. It is pretty weak - GN10 or something. It also doubles as AF light, which is great to scare away wildlife. --88.75.236.255 (talk) 08:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic