Talk:Simon Gipson
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 November 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled edit
Hey harro, before you decide to just blindly redirect pages, perhaps you should stop blowing your own horn and read the damn papers once in awhile, or perhaps even check out the lovely references they have going here and see how popular Simons opinion is with the press :P
- This article has been listed for deletion. Citing past instances of principal articles being deleted or redirected, I point to J.T. Vallance and Robert Knight. Harro5 06:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- We contend that the above examples are no-where near as significant personalities as Simon is, a quick google study reveals that only the query 'Simon Gipson' returns with the entire front page mentioning him. It is also revealed that he appears to freelance educational research, along with his avant garde approach to education which has seen him feature in newspaper articles on at least 12 seperate occasions, he has also appeared on television multiple times and is renowned in the educational community. We feel that this warrants the establishment of his own, seperate page. Afterall, wikipedia is not paper. 210.49.170.242 11:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Published works section edit
I don't think it goes along with Wikipedia policy to post a series of extracts from copyrighted works written by Gipson. Perhaps it would be best to write a summary paragraph about his position on various issues, using quotes where appropriate, and then just leave a list of links to articles he has written, possibly even in a subpage called List of articles by Simon Gipson. Any thoughts? Harro5 00:10, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Point taken about Wikipedia Policy; it would however be feasable to ask Gipson to grant permission for the extracts to be shown here on Wikipedia, what do you think? Otherwise I can see your point and summaries should be written then perhaps in lieu of permission. Beyondcapricorn 11:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- It would probably be OK, but here's my feeling: this article is supposed to be about Gipson and his work. While what he has written is certainly important to this article, I don't think you need chunks of it added in here to make that point. I'd prefer to create a subpage with a list of links to look something like this: (as an example)
List of articles by Simon Gipson
Newspaper Using some columms here, maybe Article title/Publication/Date/Link
List them with links, thus not needing to worry about copyrights. This could still go on the Gipson page, but in my view would be better set out if on a list page. Thoughts? Harro5 20:52, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Simon Gipson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060116152022/http://moneymanager.smh.com.au/planning/guides/articles/school02.html to http://moneymanager.smh.com.au/planning/guides/articles/school02.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.voiceanddata.com.au/vd/pop_ups/pop_print.asp?id=360 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060222060324/http://www.iartv.vic.edu.au/publications_f/seminar_series_latest.htm to http://www.iartv.vic.edu.au/publications_f/seminar_series_latest.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050617111730/http://aset.org.au/confs/edtech98/pubs/articles/gipson2.html to http://www.aset.org.au/confs/edtech98/pubs/articles/gipson2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050617112204/http://aset.org.au/confs/edtech98/pubs/articles/gipson1.html to http://www.aset.org.au/confs/edtech98/pubs/articles/gipson1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051204102114/http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2001/alexiades.html to http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2001/alexiades.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)