Talk:Shin Megami Tensei: Imagine/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 02:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't going to review another Megami Tensei article due to how dense they can get in detail but due to backlogs I'll be looking into this pretty soon. GamerPro64 02:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Lead

• "Forming part of the Megami Tensei series," I'm not sure I understand what this means with the game forming part of the series.

• Reworded, it's just meant to say it's an entry in the Megami Tensei series.--IDV^talk 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

• "post-Cataclysm Tokyo" Is the "C" supposed to be capitalized?

• So, within SMT1 and SMT2, the "end of the world" is called the Cataclysm, with a capital C. But yes, I think it's clearer to just use "post-apocalyptic", so I changed it to that.--IDV^talk 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

• "Imagine originated as an attempt at developing an online version of Shin Megami Tensei: Nine for PCs after the original version's online version was cancelled." Maybe drop the "s" in "PCs".

• Done.--IDV^talk 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Gameplay

• Neither of the sources in the last two sentences of the section mention the "Cathedral of Shadows". I take it "Kamikaze no Kan" is that place?

• It's called the Jakyou no Yakata (邪教の館, "Heretic Mansion") in Japanese, which is mentioned in the Game Watch Impress ref. In English Megami Tensei releases, that location is called the Cathedral of Shadows.--IDV^talk 19:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Allright that's fine. GamerPro64 02:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Synopsis

• This section looks fine. GamerPro64 02:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Development

• Can't help but think the word "development" is used one too many times in the section, especially in the first paragraph.

• Sorry for the delay, I'll take a look at this when I get home from work.--IDV^talk 11:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• @GamerPro64: What do you think of it now?--IDV^talk 18:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• Yeah that's good. GamerPro64 21:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Release

• This section is fine. GamerPro64 21:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Reception

• This section is fine. GamerPro64 20:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Sources

• The sourcing is done well, with all the sources being reliable and in-line.

Ok. After two weeks of looking into this, I am comfortable with passing this article. If anyone has problems with the article, they can always take it to GAR. GamerPro64 03:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Somehow missed this last message until now, but thank you.--IDV^talk 16:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)