Talk:Shaunti Feldhahn
 | This page was proposed for deletion by ZettaComposer (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment: Fails WP:GNG for lack of independent coverage and sources. It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2019-06-18 with the comment: Significant coverage in cited source. Additional coverage in [1]. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
I've removed some of the claims on this page that appeared to be NPOV and unverifiable. These include the claim that Feldhahn has "helped to open ... eyes" and that her most recent books "lead to life change and many fascinating conversations." If these claims are verified they should be reinserted carefully -- I felt as though their tone made the article sound like an advertisement for Feldhahn's writing. GJ (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Good work so far, but this entry still reads like the "author bio" portion of a press packet edit
GJ has done commendable work on this entry. Unfortunately, it still reads like a PR handout for an author tour. That's no reflection on GJ. Normal editing procedures won't fix this kind of writing. Even if you cut out demonstrably non-neutral sentences, the prose itself remains non-neutral down to its bones. IMO, this thing needs a top-to-bottom rewrite in sober encyclopedic style. 67.244.76.130 (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)TNH