Talk:Sharon Sullivan
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled edit
Isabell McBryde article has a lot of her career awards and achievements but did not really explore any of her work.
Bibliography notes : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1835-9310.1978.tb00666.x
Peer Review from Shawn Laib edit
I really like the information you gave on her accomplishments and schooling. It looks like you should put some of that information, like on the cultural resource management program, into the section on career instead of education. You haven't yet created an introduction paragraph on the person, but completeness is not to be expected yet, obviously. I really like your use of reliable sources, and you already have the complete number of references in the section for those, which is five of them. Overall, this article already looks more complete than our article does. All of the headings are correctly placed and named and you are well on your way to a great article.
Peer review from Griffyn Holbrook edit
So far it looks really good. All of your sources seem strong and reliable, which is a good start for constructing an article as it seems there is plenty of content to sift through. I guess my biggest thing to note is the fact that there are three separate sentences that begin with or are entirely "she graduated..." two of which have two different dates (kinda sorta) and yet neither mention the level of education, as of undergrad/graduate. I mean, it is fairly early in the writing process, so just something to note really.
Ohjeezohman (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Yichun's Peer Review edit
The page looks good! I think somethings that may be missing from the articles are a photo of Sharon Sullivan, and maybe can expand more on the indigenous specialization of Sullivan, also if you ended up with only Honors and Awards under the career topic, then may it is good just to use honors and awards and not using it as a subtopic. Because this page is desginated to describing Sullivan I think you don't need to have Sharon Sullivan next to the topic of Early Life and Education. LGoldl (talk 04:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)