Talk:Sharon Burch
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
{{WikiProject Women in Music |class=Stub |importance=Low} How do I get a hold of Sharon Burch? We are wanting for her to come entertain at our women’s gathering
Sharon Burch entry arguments against proposed deletion
editA user called OohBunnies! "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:OohBunnies%21" suggested this article fails to adhere to General Notability Guidelines (GNG).
Actually I can see why it is proposed for deletion.
When I wrote it I wanted to know more about a person who had made some music and events or speeches (I don't remember) relating to Native Americans. Now I can see that there must be a limit for notability, more so in order for Wikipedia to survive, maybe?
I wanted Wikipedia to be able to give honest answers about people who had published literature or music, and I think Sharon Burch falls into that category. However, even publishing today is not what it once was, a guarantee that some people had made a review and found the stories, novels, art, music or textbook interesting enough. Well I need to read more about GNG. What does this translate into: "significant coverage in secondary sources"-
For now I add references and then remove the proposed deletion.
I am shocked by your name "OohBunnies!" on Wikipedia, and I wonder if you are a serious person, but for now I am not digging into that. You may have seen a controversial (very religious bio-article which I tried to write) was criticized, and you may think that this author was an easy "target". I have once before been up against an editor who really only wanted to get power over Wikipedia in order to spread some political messages, a user who was expelled, so therefore I am going into details about your identity later. --d-axel (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC)