Talk:Sexual anhedonia
 | A fact from Sexual anhedonia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 March 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
humans only?
editThis article implies that this condition affects only humans, but doesn't expressly state so. Can someone help to clarify please? --Rebroad (talk) 21:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- It actually doesn't say that. Don't add citation needed tags where they don't make sense. Personally, I can't imagine that there's much literature about this condition in non-humans. I'm willing to be surprised, of course, but the article as it stands is perfectly fine, and if such information exists, it should, of course, be added. But the citation needed tag that was there is not helpful in the slightest. -- KS | T 01:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes humans only because animals can not talk about their experience.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
One source
editThe write-up is derived mostly from the Perelman source. The items in the bibliography are not cited in the text and their relevance is not established. Article could use some work along these lines but unfortunately I'm not expert in the area myself 108.68.114.39 (talk) 17:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Too many links/references to .org website
editI think there are too many references to sexualmed.org. At this time there are (4) four. These are not reliable references and may be advertising. It is beyond my skill as an Wikipedia editor to challenge the references without deleting the entire article. --Mark v1.0 (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Removal of causes
editI had written an addition of causes for Sexual anhedonia and it was removed by an editor named Saidmann. I need another editors opinion if the a medical cause of anhedonia is not relevant.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
"Sexual aversion and lack of sexual enjoyment" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sexual aversion and lack of sexual enjoyment. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Treatment
editcan someone add L-arginine to the treatment section it has improved since i last seen it but I am a newb and don't want to try and edit this page plus I do not like to play in the sand that is a joke about the sand box 19dreiundachtzig (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)