 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
editffs, as a reasonably educated person, I read the current version and wonder what dodgy non-english speaking philosophy student wrote this. We're on the case and will convert the page in the next week.
211.30.203.243 09:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)ian@wakeman-moss.freeserve.co.uk
- Good call. This page is about as sophomoric and incomprehensible as they come. Although I might add that it has been several weeks and no change has been made. -69.47.186.226 02:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, after another attempt at deciphering this page, I'm thinking it's better off being deleted. Even if we could winnow out whatever useful information is in the article, we'd be left with a shoddy Wiktionary definition--and I'm guessing Wiktionary already has a better one. I see no point in keeping an article this incomprehensible. I'm nominating it for deletion. -69.47.186.226 03:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Here information
editthis article is empty, here is my contribution with a reliable quote https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/sensual Hastengeims (talk) 15:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)