This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I am not sure merging the articles is a good idea. There are two reasons. First, Groups still exist. Second, the various responsibilities are enshrined in international treaty and federal law and have specific meaning.
--- Safemariner01:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I appreciate your feedback. First, what Groups are left? Aren't they Sector Field Offices now? Second, which international treaties? The way I propose the merge is to have each previous article become a section of Sector Commander. Redirects from the old article names would be forwarded to the appropriate section of Sector Commander. Of the four articles, only Captain of the Port seems to have a meaning beyond a title now held by the U.S. Coast Guard Sector Commander, and much of the text of the four articles is the same. --Pesco00:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Please let me know what you think of the merges. All former articles, with the exception of Captain of the Port, are now redirects to the appropriate section of Sector Commander. No more overlap across four articles. There were few articles that linked to any of the former articles; all of those links have been left intact. --Pesco03:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
