| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seamax M-22 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Update Needed edit
This aircraft is no longer the only amphibious Light Sports Aircraft (LSA) sold in the USA. In 2009/2010, Icon began manufacturing their own amphibious LSA and has been selling them for some time since then. For more information, please refer to the following websites...
Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICON_A5
Company website: http://www.iconaircraft.com/
There are other similar craft that I have spotted on Wikipedia as well, however I'm not completely certain if they completely fall within the criteria for LSA set down by the FAA. Further research into this matter may be required. If others do indeed qualify as amphibious LSA, then perhaps a portal should be made for them as they are starting to pick up in popularity.
BlackAeronaut (talk) 18:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
This add seriously reads like an advertisement "after years of research and 21 other designs...." WHO even did the research? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.52.12.243 (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)