Talk:Sd.Kfz. 6
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Klbrain in topic About Merging With The Article Sd,kfz 6/3 and 6/2.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sd.Kfz. 6 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Sd.Kfz. 6/2 page were merged into Sd.Kfz. 6 on 14 October 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
SdKfz 6 found in Poland edit
Hello wikipedians! This vehicle was found recently in Poland, think you might be interested: http://technowinki.onet.pl/inne/multimedia/unikatowy-pojazd-sdkfz-6-z-czasow-ii-wojny-swiatow,5213332,0,foto-male.html Wielkizielonymelon (talk) 07:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sources for expansion? Images of variants? edit
Hi Wikipedians, I'm after verifiable sources to expand the article to a B-class if possible. Also I'm after good quality "free" pics of the variants 6/2 & 6/3, to include in the article. Can anyone please help? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 13:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Id hellp. If i wasnt busy eating doritos. Some Random Dingus (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
About Merging With The Article Sd,kfz 6/3 and 6/2. edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To merge Sd,kfz 6/3 and Sd.Kfz. 6/2 to Sd.Kfz. 6; short text, context; no policy-based counterarguments. Klbrain (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
If you look at the variants section, you'll see that the variant has only 1 sentence of coverage, where has my article has a few more, so i am against merging this. Some Random Dingus (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- The variant is not relevant enough to be eligible for its own article, all info belongs to this main article. But that need better sources than tanks encyclopedia. Your main part, development of the F-22, is entirely irrelevant, a simple link to the gun article is sufficient. Lots of factual errors in your texts. --Denniss (talk) 19:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- The same applies to the 6/2 article. --Denniss (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Lemme find a few 100-200 sources then. Happy? Some Random Dingus (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Update: i quit dis shit. Some Random Dingus (talk) 06:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The same applies to the 6/2 article. --Denniss (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Merge - better to have it all together. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- i h o n e s t l y d i d n t f u c k i n g a s k. Some Random Dingus (talk) 08:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Just noting that there doesn't seem to be a 6/3 article (or not one I can find). Klbrain (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Addendum: missed that it had been moved to a draft: Draft:Sd kfz 6/3 Klbrain (talk) 11:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)