Talk:Scholastic accolades

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthroponymy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename and rework to "scholastic accolade"? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

We currently don't have an article about scholastic accolades, but the majority of the entries seem to fall into that category. Therefore, I would like to rename this article to "scholastic accolade", which is currently a redirect here.

Currently, this article consists almost exclusively of doctors in theology and law. Does that reflect the reality, or is it an artefact, given that most of the article has been stolen from the Catholic Encyclopedia?

How reliable or relevant are these nicknames? I just checked a number of entries, and for the vast majority I was not able to verify the nicknames:

For many entries, we don't have any article. Finding information about those on the internet is hard; Google searches like "Praeclarus Peter Kaiserslautern 1330 -Irrefragibilis" only show links to snippets of this article or of The new international encyclopaedia; never to anything about the person in question. I am afraid we will ever never have an article on most of them.
Where we do have articles, those often don't mention the accolade. I checked the the following:
- Anselm of Canterbury - not in article
- Anselm of Laon - not in article
- William of Champeaux - not in article
- Gilbert, Bishop of London - part of (redirected) article name
- Peter Abelard - not in article
- Bernard of Clairvaux - article contains link to Doctor Mellifluus without mentioning it's his accolade or nickname

I have seen Aristoteles being called "[THE] philosophus", but I don't consider that a "nickname". Likewise with "apostolus", which btw would need a citation.

What's the best way to address this? Should we only should keep those entries in the list for which we have, or likely will have, articles? Should we start fleshing out the redlinks? — Sebastian 10:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I concur. These are not "nicknames", and the title should not have "nicknames" in it. Rwflammang (talk)

Keep the redlinks. WP:LSC means starting with a list like that in the Catholic Encyclopedia is basically a good idea. We can't say absolutely in advance that every name in the list is notable, but given the kind of list it is, it is certainly plausible. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Would it be desirable to supply translations for these accolades?AKMAdam (talk) 11:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add a column to the table such that the Latin column is followed by the English translation column edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would be nice when someone has time to backfill the new column. Quercus solaris (talk) 19:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic