This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The article looks WP:NPOV to me. Maybe we should a request for comment or review to make sure.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
I really don’t know whether it maintains a neutral point of view or not, or how notable Sara C. Bisel is in the context of a Wikipedia article. I added the {{coi}} template because the article has essentially only one author who appears to be related to the subject. He/she may be doing an excellent job. Alternatively he/she may have fallen into the trap of unconsciously exaggerating the importance of the subject. It’s a trap that even experienced editors fall into when writing about something that enthuses them. (I know I do, now and then.)
So yes, I think there is a case for trying to find an editor who is familiar with the field to see whether or not the article needs to be toned down a bit. (Or toned up.) —Ian Spackman 14:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
in any case, it is not a speedy deletion for notability--it makes a clear claim to notability. DGG (talk) 19:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Bisel is a significant archaeologist, having done importatn long-term work in Italy and in physical anthropology related to forensic anthropology. On the other hand, it is wrong to say she helped usher in FA: Dorsey, Hrdlicka and Stewart worked in and developed the field before she did - just to mention three compatriots of hers. Around the beginning of the 20th century, osteohistological work was done in Hungary that, though not named FA, was in that area. See also Schwidetzky, I. (1954). "Forensic anthropology in Germany," Human Biology 26:1–20.Kdammers (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
