Talk:Samaritan script

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Writing systems High‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

=Question edit

I would like to use this script. How can I get it from UniCode? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

GNU UniFont 5.1 (2008 Sept 7) does not appear to contain any code for the Samaritan x800-x83f page section. Is there a comprehensive UniCode font available that includes Samaritan? A good place to include this information, I think, would be in the UniCode section of this article. The UniCode section does not display anything nice without a Samaritan UniCode font installed and enabled in the browser. There are announcements that UniCode 5.2 standard has been released and that the 5.2 UniCode standard includes the Samaritan font section. I have yet to find any 5.2 UniCode comprehensive font. Howard McCay (talk) 23:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

From http://sourceforge.net/projects/culmus/files/ I downloaded AncientSemiticFonts-0.06-1-Win.zip (be sure to get the download most appropriate to your operating system), expanded the archive, installed Samarit.ttf, and set my browser to use as default font Hebrew Samaritan (in FireFox: Tools[menu]>Options[submenu]>Content[tab]>Fonts and Colors[section]>Default Font=Hebrew Samaritan[selection]). Then my browser correctly displays the first twenty-two (out of thirty-one) UniCode codes as the twenty-two Samaritan letters. I am not happy with this workaround as I imagine I will have to reset the default font every time I change to another alphabet not in the global UniCode font. Howard McCay (talk) 02:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oldest Samaritan text still existent today edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've read the oldest Samaritan texts (i.e. in the Samaritan script) said to still be existent today (manuscripts, etc) are among the Samaritan community a claimed 11th century CE text and that scholars have and study from the 16th century CE.Historylover4 (talk) 21:10, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is not given; it seems to be assumed that it is the same as that of the hebrew letters. --Manfariel (talk) 18:58, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Is the interleaving of historical vs. religious perspectives in the second paragraph consistent with best editorial practices? edit

I was surprised to see historical/anthropological views on the script's origin juxtoposed with religious interpretations in the second paragraph. Both views should be included, but I don't think it's normal to write things as [academic fact] followed immediately by [although some religions don't agree]. Normally I'd separate these into a dedicated paragraphs for the academic consensus, and for the religious consensus, and clearly compartmentalize and contextualize these two (very different and irreconcilable) notions of truth.

Add topic