Talk:Sam Weisman
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Noirdesirs in topic Is this an article ?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is this an article ?
editThis article really needs some development. Sam Weisman deserves more than that. I gave a look to the French article, it's much better ! How 's that possible since Weisman is American ? I'll try to write a few thing when I have time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noirdesirs (talk • contribs) 21:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Not only should this article NOT be expanded, it's reasonable that it should be removed entirely. This gent's extremely minor work doesn't really deserve an encylopedic article. One of the most offensive entertainment related things I've seen recently was seeing at the beginning of the useless movie Bye Bye Love the title credit "A Same Weisman Film"!!!! This honor used to be reserved just for top filmmakers like Kubrick, Kramer, Preminger, Wise, etc. I know this has become a more common practice, but one such as Weismna should be embarrased to have such a credit, except that his ego and agent surely forced the producers into including it! pathetic!