Talk:Sajin Vass Gunawardena
Latest comment: 10 years ago by MilesMoney in topic Contents on this page
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Contesting deletion edit
Keep: The question is notability, the said person is an elected Member of the Sri Lankan Parliament, and noted in public for his activity as CEO of Mihin Lanka. Hence I see at notability is not a criteria to delete this.Cossde (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Contents on this page edit
Dear John Reaves, I left you message on your TalkPage about blanking huge sections of this article. Whilst I agree with some general clean-up you performed, I do not agree with mass deletion of content, especially from an Admin of your experience. I am sure you have noticed that all "allegations or claims" are properly referenced and the source is media news. Please discuss before mass removal of content. Cheers AKS
- Replied at my talk page. -- John Reaves 07:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- User:John Reaves, two comments from an outsider:
- It's clear that Arunsingh16 isn't exactly up on Wikipedia policy. Rather than threatening to block, I'd like to suggest that I might be more productive if you took a moment to explain why those sources aren't reliable. You don't have to go over all of them; it'll be sufficiently education if you just pick two or three. The upside is that, if they understand your explanation, they will understand why you keep reverting and this will diffuse the situation.
- I haven't checked the sources and I have no opinion on the content in dispute. However, the English in this article is terrible. It's obvious that much of it was written by editors for whom English is not a primary language. Perhaps, after the dust has settled over these BLP issues, we could work to make the article more intelligible.
- HTH. MilesMoney (talk) 11:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- User:John Reaves, two comments from an outsider:
- Hello MilesMoney. Thanks for your feedback. I only have one doubt; if you are saying that you haven't checked the sources and hence have no opinion on the dispute then how can you suggest that I am not upto the Policy? I request you to read my reply in this when you have time. I have explained by point what wrong actions did Admin take as far as this article is concerned. Cheers AKS