Talk:Saint Eustace

Melkite saint removed

Untitled

The Melkite Saint commemorated in Dec. has a completely different Hagiography. There doesn't seem to be any reason to think they're the same and no source is cited for them being the same, so I've removed that. --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Uncited text

The subsection entitled Sacred Presence appears to be copied wholesale from an interpretive guide to art within Vézelay Abbey. If the text is freely available (which is doubtful) it should be cited and a photo of the sculpture -- a capital -- would make this much more sensible. Also the text is faulty grammatically and syntactically and needs editing. Or maybe the whole thing should be scrapped. LandruBek (talk) 18:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I started editing it but I don't have the original text, which is probably not in the public domain anyway. It's not too informative either. I also think it should be removed or attempted to be wikified (not by me, sorry). Stassa (talk) 08:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: The Nave Sculpture of Vezelay by Kirk Ambrose. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saint Eustace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205012006/http://catholic-forum.com/saints/sainte17.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/sainte17.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)