This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reverted
editNote, I reverted this article to this previous version. Yes, I agree it needs a lot of work, but this company:
- is large,
- not covered in any other article,
- most importantly notable enough that the French and Swedish Wikipedias have articles about the corporation.
Note that in OTRS ticket 2010070510028591 I have been in contact with a marketing representative of the company. I have discussed the extent to which a corporation can properly interact with their Wikipedia article, so I don't expect the one recent editor from the corporation to do anything but discuss the content on this talk page. I sent the communication a few minutes ago, so there is no acknowledgment of Wikipedia's policies, which I am confident she wasn't aware of in advance.
That said, hopefully we can work this article into shape, and get it fully referenced and polished. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Improved
editRemoved stub template here and the improvement blurb on the main page. This article is certainly OK now. Nixdorf (talk) 11:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)