Talk:Rutherford model

Archive 1 created

Please see this page for more talk articles. Anarchyte (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

External Links are dead 404

Both externals lead to the university website where the article is not found — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planex1832 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Obsolete?

After reading this article twice, I find that it does not belong in the Category of "Obsolete scientific theories," and therefore I have removed the category from this article.--71.36.99.75 (talk) 22:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Why is this? The theory is no longer used, and the current atomic model is the cloud model. I think that this qualifies as obsolete, unless there is some other category for no-longer used scientific theories. 50.90.74.156 (talk) 01:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

why alpha particles are not deflected by electrons Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Theoretically, they could be, but the charge is so spread out and the electron mass so much smaller that any effects from the electron cloud are basically negligible. 166.181.82.127 (talk) 06:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rutherford model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060502124241/http://www.rwc.uc.edu:80/koehler/biophys/7a.html to http://www.rwc.uc.edu/koehler/biophys/7a.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060902103523/http://www2.kutl.kyushu-u.ac.jp:80/seminar/MicroWorld1_E/Part2_E/P25_E/Rutherford_model_E.htm to http://www2.kutl.kyushu-u.ac.jp/seminar/MicroWorld1_E/Part2_E/P25_E/Rutherford_model_E.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Blunder

What is the blunder of Rutherford's atomic nature Max Yusuf (talk) 04:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Chemistry

Niel Bohr model of atom 197.215.27.63 (talk) 20:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

@197.215.27.63 why alpha particle was not difflected by electrons? Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)