 | Rush Brook was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 12, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rush Brook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170202003341/https://oaspub.epa.gov/tmdl/attains_watershed.control?p_huc=02050107&p_state=PA&p_cycle=2006&p_report_type=A to http://oaspub.epa.gov/tmdl/attains_watershed.control?p_huc=02050107&p_state=PA&p_cycle=2006&p_report_type=A
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rush Brook/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Georgejdorner (talk · contribs) 17:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Open review edit
A quick initial reading shows the placement of the History and Rec section creates a reverse chronology of events. The consequences of human actions upon Rush Brook precede the historic account of the actions. A quick click-through of cite links to sources reveals #5 and #7 link to cover pages instead of proof, and I have doubts about #10. I believe these items should be remedied before the review proceeds. I will place this review on hold pending your response.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)