Talk:Rush Brook/GA1
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Georgejdorner in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Georgejdorner (talk · contribs) 17:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Open review
editA quick initial reading shows the placement of the History and Rec section creates a reverse chronology of events. The consequences of human actions upon Rush Brook precede the historic account of the actions. A quick click-through of cite links to sources reveals #5 and #7 link to cover pages instead of proof, and I have doubts about #10. I believe these items should be remedied before the review proceeds. I will place this review on hold pending your response.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)