Notability Assement (if you want to update copy this one and make a change do not delete this one though, if you disagree please state you do so and give reasons)

edit

Source assessment table: prepared by User:NotOrrio
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20110226192406/http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/web23/Home.nsf/AllDocs/FF5ECD6545A6083BCA25766600141DE9?OpenDocument   Made by government who runs the route   Government website ~ Only a some part of this page makes coverage of the bus route No
https://citymapper.com/melbourne/bus/buses-901   City planner is a secondary source and is not alfilliated with PTV or Kinetic   This source is shown to be reliable and consists of real time information   Only gives information about the mentioned bus route Yes
https://www.danielbowen.com/2018/03/02/every-bus-a-smartbus/   The source is an independant blog ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail ? Unknown
https://www.danielbowen.com/transport/melb-changes/   The source is an independant blog ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail ? Unknown
https://www.wearekinetic.com/media/kinetic-wins-victorian-government-contract-to-run-a-third-of-melbournes-bus-network   Press release from company who runs the bus route   Press release from the operating company   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/new-bus-franchise-jump-start-zero-emissions-pledge   Press release from government who runs the bus route   Government press release   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/thirty-six-new-electric-buses-by-2025-as-melbourne-company-awarded-2-3b-contract-20211002-p58wmu.html   Major Australian news article   Major Australian news article   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/7531/frankston-melbourne-airport/   Run by government who operates the bus   Government Website   Mentions the said bus route and only the bus route No
https://moovitapp.com/melbourne-2803/lines/901/314882/4288141/en-gb?ref=2&customerId=4908   Independant from the government and rollingstock operator   Website has proven to be reliable and consists of real time information   Mentions the bus route and only the bus route Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Assement of Anylysis-

Only 2 sources fullfill the notability guide, out of 9, 1 more source is reliable however does not have significant coverage needs 1 or 2 more sources that fullfill the notability guide to be considerd notable NotOrrio (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notability Assement 2 (if you want to update copy this one and make a change do not delete this one though, if you disagree please state you do so and give reasons)

edit

Source assessment table: prepared by User:NotOrrio
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20110226192406/http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/web23/Home.nsf/AllDocs/FF5ECD6545A6083BCA25766600141DE9?OpenDocument   Made by government who runs the route   Government website ~ Only a some part of this page makes coverage of the bus route No
https://citymapper.com/melbourne/bus/buses-901   City planner is a secondary source and is not alfilliated with PTV or Kinetic   This source is shown to be reliable and consists of real time information   Only gives information about the mentioned bus route Yes
https://www.danielbowen.com/2018/03/02/every-bus-a-smartbus/   The source is an independant blog ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail ? Unknown
https://www.danielbowen.com/transport/melb-changes/   The source is an independant blog ? The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't neccecarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims ~ The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail ? Unknown
https://www.wearekinetic.com/media/kinetic-wins-victorian-government-contract-to-run-a-third-of-melbournes-bus-network   Press release from company who runs the bus route   Press release from the operating company   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/new-bus-franchise-jump-start-zero-emissions-pledge   Press release from government who runs the bus route   Government press release   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/thirty-six-new-electric-buses-by-2025-as-melbourne-company-awarded-2-3b-contract-20211002-p58wmu.html   Major Australian news article   Major Australian news article   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/7531/frankston-melbourne-airport/   Run by government who operates the bus   Government Website   Mentions the said bus route and only the bus route No
https://moovitapp.com/melbourne-2803/lines/901/314882/4288141/en-gb?ref=2&customerId=4908   Independant from the government and rollingstock operator   Website has proven to be reliable and consists of real time information   Mentions the bus route and only the bus route Yes
https://www.traveller.com.au/the-odyssey-2w8py   Major Australian Travel article   Major Australian Travel article   Main topic is PTV route 901, the bus route mentioned in the following wikipedia article Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Assement of Anylysis- 3 Sources fullfill the notability guide 1 timetable, 1 map and 1 article, based on the fact that 3 different types of sources fullfill the guide its safe to say the article is notable


Source assessment table: prepared by User:Dan_arndt
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20110226192406/http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/web23/Home.nsf/AllDocs/FF5ECD6545A6083BCA25766600141DE9?OpenDocument   Made by government who runs the route   Government website   Only a some part of this page makes coverage of the bus route No
https://citymapper.com/melbourne/bus/buses-901   City planner is a secondary source and is not alfilliated with PTV or Kinetic   This source is shown to be reliable and consists of real time information   Only gives information about the mentioned bus route No
https://www.danielbowen.com/2018/03/02/every-bus-a-smartbus/   The source is an independant blog   The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't necessarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims   The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail No
https://www.danielbowen.com/transport/melb-changes/   The source is an independant blog   The source is a blog information may not be true but isn't necessarily unreliable as the blog does use reliable sources to back their claims   The bus route is mentioned somewhat but not in detail No
https://www.wearekinetic.com/media/kinetic-wins-victorian-government-contract-to-run-a-third-of-melbournes-bus-network   Press release from company who runs the bus route   Press release from the operating company   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/new-bus-franchise-jump-start-zero-emissions-pledge   Press release from government who runs the bus route   Government press release   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/thirty-six-new-electric-buses-by-2025-as-melbourne-company-awarded-2-3b-contract-20211002-p58wmu.html   Major Australian news article   Major Australian news article   No mentioning of the bus route what so ever No
https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/7531/frankston-melbourne-airport/   Run by government who operates the bus   Government Website   Mentions the said bus route and only the bus route No
https://moovitapp.com/melbourne-2803/lines/901/314882/4288141/en-gb?ref=2&customerId=4908   Independant from the government and rollingstock operator   Website has proven to be reliable and consists of real time information   Mentions the bus route and only the bus route No
https://www.traveller.com.au/the-odyssey-2w8py   Major Australian Travel article   Major Australian Travel article   Main topic is PTV route 901, the bus route mentioned in the following Wikipedia article Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Assement of Anylysis- Only one source potentially satisfies the requirements of being significant coverage in an independent secondary source. Timetables and maps are evidence that the bus route exists but are not considered significant coverage for the purposes of establishing notability. Based on the above the draft clearly does not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Dan arndt (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply