This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Rosemary Owens is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
delete she has been spamming promoting herself on the internet. this is against the law!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Macromacromm (talk • contribs) 22:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I question the notability of this article, because being Dean of Law doesn't automatically mean that you should have a Wikipedia page. In addition, if you look on the University of Adelaide website, Rosemary Owens is not the Dean, John Williams is. If you Google her name you find a string of petitions. In addition, she hasn't even got one connection on her LinkedIn page (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/rosemary-owens/21/909/835). There are questions on both the notability, as well as neutrality of the article. There is a lot of information about her on this page, including how she is a tutor, a senior lecturer, her education degree, arts degree majoring in history... They aren't even referenced. Seeing how she has created a LinkedIn page to advertise herself, it seems this Wikipedia page has been created for the same reason. Unfortunately, this is an encyclopedia, not a place for advertising yourself! Kingwadez (talk) 13:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
There's little content that can be seen as advertising - it all seems like simple factual statements about roles she has held, without any other opinions expressed. As such, I can't see any real reason for the tags, so I've removed them for now. In regards to notability, a Dean is the highest appointed academic post in an Australian university, so on those grounds she appears to pass Wikipedia:Notability (academics). - Bilby (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
