Talk:Rosemary Kirstein
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Correct misleading use of a source edit
> Kirstein did not consider writing her "day job", and thus produced work at a slow rate, until she left that day job.
The source provided does not support these assertions. She did not leave her day job, she was fired. In that blogpost she does not mention that she previously produced work at a slow rate or that she'd work faster in the future. She doesn't even explicitly mention that she doesn't plan on getting a new job, though she refers to an old post where she said she thought her day job days were numbered. Perhaps some other blogposts support this assertion, but this one only supports the idea that she lost her job in 2015.
https://www.rosemarykirstein.com/2015/12/remember-when-i-said-that-i-thought-my-day-job-days-might-be-numbered/ Catrolean (talk) 03:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)