Talk:Romanian Wikipedia

Romanian & Moldovan Wikipedia

Have you already heard about this? Do you think that in that article can be written anything about it? D T G 19:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Aromanian Wikipedia

It is true that the Aromanian Wikipedia has never got anywhere. Despite the insistence of the people who wanted it set up that it was going to be a proper Wikipedia, they have created not even fifty pages in two years of existence.

So you do think that it should be mentioned in article about _romanian wikipedia_? D_T_G (PL) 10:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, it should be mentioned that the Aromanian Wikipedia was basically trialled on the Romanian Wikipedia first (sort of like an Aromanian test-wiki was set up on ro.wp) and that the idea for the Aromanian Wikipedia came from the Romanian Wikipedia community. Ronline ✉ 13:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Romanian wikipedia = stubpedia, 10 random article ---> 8 stub, like this: "Melissia este un oraş în Grecia.". Useless, ridiculous. It's a fact, why delete?

Article count

Actually, Romanian Wikipedia is now in 21st position, but it could easily get to 19th. It could also do a lot worse, so maybe we should say it "struggles to be in the first 20" or something... --Venatoreng 08:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Customer profile for trainers tracking device

Tracking device 95.148.61.79 (talk) 22:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)