This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Toddlute (talk·contribs) has been paid by Antenna Group on behalf of Robert Zeidman. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I don’t agree with Mr Zeidman’s political views, but I’m an IEEE member and hold MS and PhD degrees in EE.
For the record, I’ve never met or communicated with Zeidman.
We (IEEE) only grant awards on technological merit, and even if the author wrote the entire page himself, he’s well within rights to cite these verifiable facts because they are notable and significant. B. Student, CFA (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Melcous can you clarify further? Awards granted by IEEE are reliable independent secondary sources. They are granted based on a body of published papers in IEEE and related publications. My understanding of Wikipedia's definition of 'no original research' refers to original research not previously published in a bona fide refereed journal or conference proceedings. My interpretation tacitly assumes that the rule exists because the Wikipedia community has neither the bandwidth nor accreditation to act as academic referees. So, for example, I'm assuming that if Peter Higgs were to summarize portions of his published work in a Wikipedia article on the Higgs Boson it would not violate the rule because Wikipedia is not the original-source-of-publication for the original research.
I could be wrong here - if so it seems to be kind of a silly rule prima facie, ... BUT I acknowledge that I may be under-informed regarding numerous ways the "I-did-my-own-research" crowd and/or articles in shady "pay-for-play" journals might game the system. B. Student, CFA (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
