Talk:Rivière-du-Loup

Canada: Quebec / Geography / Communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled edit

"The second most spectacular sunset in the world"... who makes that assertion? Is this passage sufficiently objective? --Liberlogos 04:25, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Rename page edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move.

Rename: Rivière-du-Loup, Quebec → Rivière-du-Loup Per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE, this city should have an article at the undisambiguated name (see also WP:CANCITY). An internet search which excludes various combinations of this city's name still produces results exclusively related to it. Mind matrix 15:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Support as nominator. Mind matrix 15:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Support per CANSTYLE. -Royalguard11(T) 00:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Support, as per nom's search findings, naming convention and primary usage. Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic