Talk:Richard Corliss

Comment

I edited one sentence from the article, which was the following: "He has been known to show favoritism to left-wing cinema, while inserting his own right-bashing agenda in the process." I ran out of space, but it was clearly an unsubstantiated claim made I believe by someone with an ax to grind, and I removed it because there was no cited basis in fact for such a statement.Cvbear 20:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

• • Made one last removal, of the following vandalism: "he is a fine example of Richard's professionalism - http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1640053,00.html, in this wonderful review he couldn't get the voice actors name right, or the lead actor's name right and he clearly didn't pay any attention at all to the movie he was supposed to be reviewing, for a "professional" this a low class piece of rubbish that deserves to be the end of his career." Cvbear 20:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Quotes

May I ask why the "Mausoleum air ..." quote is repeated? Frank Landsman (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Add to Conflict and criticism

TIME critic raves for the "Observe & Report" rape scene http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2009/04/time-critic-raves-for-the-observe-report-rape-scene.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.117.30 (talk) 02:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Este sujeto R. Corliss carece de credibilidad. Lo prueba la absurda lista de sus 100 mejores películas de la historia. Está loco o es un ignorante.

R. Corliss lacks credibility. We tested his absurd list of 100 best movies of history. He is crazy or ignorant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.240.85.46 (talk) 13:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Bibliography

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Corliss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051029023042/http://leonardo.spidernet.net/Artus/2386/corliss.htm to http://leonardo.spidernet.net/Artus/2386/corliss.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)