Talk:Richard C. Bush
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because Richard C. Bush is worthy of an entry in Wikipedia. What we need is further elaboration and constructive suggestions for better edition, which will fulfill the spirit of Wikipedia better. Thank you an advance for any constructive suggestion about edition. :)
Spaced Out, Needs Fleshing Out
editI added section headlines like "education," "professional background" to break up the entry, which was just one block of text. I also added paragraph breaks for easier reading. I took out some detail that make this sound like a LinkedIn profile. We do not need to know exactly what months he changed jobs. I agree with the above editor. This entry is not enough and reads like a self-serving bio. But Bush is prominent enough to have a short Wikipedia entry - and this should not be deleted. PumpkinKitten (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)