Talk:Resurgence & Ecologist
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cirt in topic Merge proposal
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disambiguation page needed
editThe term 'resurgence' also applies to a modern movement within Christianity; ala http://theresurgence.com/ and elsewhere. Not sure how to disambiguate these two.
- A disambiguation page is needed for resurgence -- a variety of other uses, too. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Merger with The Ecologist
editAccording to The Ecologist's website, as of July 2012, that magazine will be merged with Resurgence, thereafter being published as Resurgence & Ecologist. Satish Kumar will edit the combined publication. See: "Resurgence and the Ecologist to Merge". DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- With the first issue of the new Resurgence & Ecologist now out, this stub has been updated accordingly. Much room for further development! DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editI propose that The Ecologist be merged into Resurgence & Ecologist since it is now part of this publication. Dougweller (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- I do not agree. There should be separate pages for Resurgence, The Ecologist and Resurgence & Ecologist as distinct publications and efforts made to develop the articles effectively. The Journals each existed for over 40 years before merger, much longer than the three years they have been together. Leutha (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose merge. Agree with comment by Leutha, above. The articles should remain separate, to document the history of each publication, as they had each existed separately, during their respective time periods. — Cirt (talk) 04:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)