Talk:Red Burns

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 67.244.14.59 in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted because the statements of fact which were flagged have either been re-written (albeit in draft form) or cited in quotes so as to best adhere to Wikipedia content guidelines.

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I don't see how the pages are identical. The webpage is just being used as a reference, to verify information in the Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinchamocha (talkcontribs) 13:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... this is about a person who recently died who has influenced the tech community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.45.199 (talk) 14:34, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the content from that page is not copyrighted. This page does need a lot of work though. In the coming days, especially with the news of her passing, the page should improve greatly.  --Luisdaniel12 (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted because the content on the page is not copyrighted & it is not infringement. The sections you refer to are simple statements of biographical fact about an internationally recognized pioneer & central figure in the new media arts, technology & education. Please don't mark for deletion. Though the page needs more work, as several other users have now noted over in the last 12-24 hours more improvements & details will surely be added in coming days due to the sad recent news of her passing & due to the resulting public outpouring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.244.14.59 (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply