This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The section on Lualhati Bautista contains passages relating to an allegation that she threatened to contact the employer of the person who red-tagged her. Similar claims have been flagged in the articles on Lualhati Bautista and SLAPP (also discussed on the SLAPP suit talk page) and deleted because of WP:BLP and WP:VERIFY. Am proposing removal of parts referencing threats to contact Bautista's accuser and related details. --Crisantom (talk) 11:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Support - After examining the pages mentioned above, I agree with Crisantom's suggestion. - Kathy97sub (talk) 15:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Per WP:BLPRS this qualifies for immediate deletion. Seven days have passed with no objections. Removed passage and pasting it below to WP:Preserve. --Crisantom (talk) 04:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
The [[Labor Code of the Philippines]] prohibits employers from removing an employee for reasons not directly relevant to their work. Further, it is by convention that the employee does not reflect his employer's opinions unless explicitly claimed.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Labor Code of the Philippines {{!}} Bureau of Labor Relations|url=https://blr.dole.gov.ph/2014/12/11/labor-code-of-the-philippines/|access-date=2020-12-03|language=en-US}}</ref> Libel and cyberlibel law in the Philippines has historically only criminalized malicious publications of defamatory articles, as in the case of Keng v. Ressa.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2020-06-15|title=Maria Ressa: Philippine journalist found guilty of cyber libel|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-53046052|access-date=2020-12-03}}</ref> Cyberlibel cannot be filed against private individuals who have no capacity to damage a person's reputation, as in the case of Badong's otherwise obscure Facebook comment.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
That subsection under "Criticism of the concept" doesn't seem to deny the existence of red-tagging as a concept, which is what the main section is about. pandakekok9 (talk) Resist internet censorship in the Philippines! 15:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
