Talk:List of recorded monarchs in the Philippines

Requested move 11 July 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as clear/uncontested consensus has been established. (closed by non-admin page mover) Music1201 talk 02:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply



Recorded list of Datus in the PhilippinesList of recorded datu in the Philippinescommon name and concise. The current name sounds awkward. Datu is a common noun so it should not be capitalized. It is also a borrowed term so it should not be pluralized. The word order is also weird. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 19:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of recorded datu in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Should the Duplication tag be removed?

edit

I don't know the complete history of the alleged duplication, but as of the moment, a check of the text seems to show minimal duplication between this page and http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/24599/lumad-first-to-sit-in-council if you don't include long noun phrases which cannot be paraphased anyway. I think the tag can be removed now. I'll do it myself in a day or two unless someone objects here. - Alternativity (talk) 02:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

This entire article should just be nuked

edit

Much of the article has practicaly vandalized by one person who is hellbent in literally spreading misinformation because he has some alternate historical fantasy where Pre-colonial Filipino Kingdoms existed and is purposefully using badly written blogs and sources to support his claims.

Please for the love of God just ban user Myrnamyers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maharlikan Maps (talkcontribs) 17:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply