Open main menu


Contents

Welcome!Edit

Hello, Shhhhwwww! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Petrb (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

DYK nomination of Philippines v. ChinaEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Philippines v. China at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Philippines v. ChinaEdit

Gatoclass (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Old TagalogEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Old Tagalog at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar  08:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014Edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the Philippines (1946–65) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {
  • date having been the day when in 1898, [[Emilio Aguinaldo]] declared independence from [[Spain]]). Later, Macapagal told author [[Stanley Karnow]] that the reason for the change was that American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm OccultZone. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Six Californias, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 14:00, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Partition and secession in California with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 14:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Reversion of recent bold editsEdit

I have reverted WP:BOLD edits you recently made to the (1521-1898) and (1898-1946) articles about the History of the Philippines. Please discuss at Talk:History of the Philippines (1898–1946)#Bold edits to two articles by user Shhhhwwww!!. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of St. Augustine Parish Church (Bay)Edit

  Hello! Your submission of St. Augustine Parish Church (Bay) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 19:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Renaming of Kendall Jenner article revertedEdit

I've reverted your renaming of the article, which was done without prior discussion and is, in my opinion, controversial. A quick search of e.g. Google News reveals that her full name is still very widely used. If you want the article renamed, you should initiate a formal discussion as explained at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Favonian (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

As a matter of fact, a similar renaming was discussed at Talk:Kendall Jenner#Requested move 21 March 2014 and soundly defeated. Favonian (talk) 07:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for St. James the Apostle Parish Church (Paete)Edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen EmpeñoEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cape BojeadorEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Cape Bojeador at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Poro PointEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Poro Point at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nuestra Señora de los Angeles Parish Church (Santa Maria)Edit

  Hello! Your submission of Nuestra Señora de los Angeles Parish Church (Santa Maria) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti)Edit

  Hello! Your submission of Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014Edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tropical Storm Fung-wong (2014) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • com/news/2014-09-18/philippines-shuts-capital-as-storm-causes-flood-cancels-flights] [[Bloomberg)]].</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Islamic State of Iraq and the LevantEdit

Thank you for the information you added to this article today. Unfortunately, it cannot go where you put it in section 13, because condemning a terrorist group is not the same as designating it as a terrorist organization. The designation of a country as a terrorist organization is a formal government ruling, and when a government does this it adds the name of the group to an official list. (You can see an example in the US citation in the information box.) I have moved your information an appropriate place in the Lead. --P123ct1 (talk) 12:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Edgardo GomezEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Edgardo Gomez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —innotata 02:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Gambling in ManilaEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Edgardo GomezEdit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Aserradora Mecanica de Tuason y SampedroEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Aserradora Mecanica de Tuason y Sampedro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Shhhhwwww!!, you still have not replied to this after over ten days. It is your responsibility, as nominator, to address issues with your DYK nominations as they come up, and I have yet to see you do so over very many nominations. If you wish to remain a nominator in good standing at DYK, you need to respond to messages like this one in a timely manner. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Regrettably, I have to close this nomination. It is disappointing that you still have not had the courtesy to respond. When you abandon a nomination like this, it is unfair to the reviewer and to the rest of us who work at DYK, whose time you have wasted. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for San Sebastian Parish Church (Lumban)Edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish Church (Pagsanjan)Edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of University of Santo Tomas Baybayin DocumentsEdit

  Hello! Your submission of University of Santo Tomas Baybayin Documents at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lagrange613 16:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Poro PointEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Betty Go-BelmonteEdit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for San Bartolome Apostol Parish Church (Nagcarlan)Edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sampaloc ChurchEdit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti)Edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Our Lady of Candelaria Parish Church (Silang)Edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for University of Santo Tomas Baybayin DocumentsEdit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lichauco Heritage HouseEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Lichauco Heritage House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Monsters Among UsEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Monsters Among Us at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Serten (talk) 21:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for St. Augustine Parish Church (Laguna)Edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominationEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Saint Paul the First Hermit CathedralEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014Edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thunder (singer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [}Category:Filipino rappers]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Parish Church (Mabitac)Edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Death of Jennifer LaudeEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Death of Jennifer Laude at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Shhhhwwww!!, it has been a full week, and you have not yet addressed the issues raised in your DYK review. One week is a standard time on Wikipedia for a response. Your failure to respond to these requests on this and previous nominations has exhausted our willingness to extend the response time on your submissions. You have one more week to respond on the nomination page. If you do not, and have edited on Wikipedia in the interim, the nomination will be closed. I hope we hear from you before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of CNN PhilippinesEdit

  Hello! Your submission of CNN Philippines at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philippines v. China
added a link pointing to Pedra Branca
Territorial disputes in the South China Sea
added a link pointing to Pedra Branca

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Monsters Among UsEdit

Mike VTalk 08:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit summariesEdit

 

Hi there.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220 of Borg 09:24, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for CNN PhilippinesEdit

Harrias talk 00:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Megalopolis (city type)
added links pointing to Kediri and Ayuthaya
Mega Manila
added a link pointing to Megalopolis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014 Ghent apartment siege for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Ghent apartment siege is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Ghent apartment siege until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 05:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015Edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Americans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not radically change the scope of an article in its lead section without receiving consensus on he article's talk page first.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:44, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Illegal immigration ‎Edit

I suggest that you need to justify your addition of the tag, by explaining it on the article talk page. If you look at the previous discussions on that page you will see that I share many of your apparent concerns over the article - but, so far, those opposing changes to the article or its title have successfully resisted changing it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your controversial page move of the Illegal immigration and Illegal immigration to the United States articlesEdit

A move like the one you did of Illegal immigration should really not be done without a formal "Requested move" discussion. If you wish to start such a discussion, you can find instructions at WP:RM. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

And the same thing (perhaps obviously) goes for your move of the Illegal immigration to the United States article. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song)Edit

  Hello! Your submission of Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Final notice: this nomination, and Uma Thurman (song) below, will be marked as unsuccessful if you fail to respond in the next 12 hours. Your continuing failure to respond to any and all DYK notices is most unfortunate, and your apparent unwillingness to provide quid pro quo reviews as required means that making those nominations only serves to waste your time and ours. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Uma Thurman (song)Edit

  Hello! Your submission of Uma Thurman (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Final notice: this nomination, and Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song) above, will be marked as unsuccessful if you fail to respond in the next 12 hours. Your continuing failure to respond to any and all DYK notices is most unfortunate, and your apparent unwillingness to provide quid pro quo reviews as required means that making those nominations only serves to waste your time and ours. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

STOP ITEdit

MARWAN IS NOT HIS REAL NAME. HIS NAME IS ZULKIFLI ABDHIR. Breckham101 (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

I agree that a proposed move should have been discussed first using the formal Wikipedia:Requested moves process. Moving "Zulkifli Abdhir" to "Marwan (terrorist)" is obviously controversial, especially when the article covers a high-profile current event. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015Edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of best-selling music artists. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

That wasn't vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
@IndianBio:, I agree. Shhhhwwww!! even gave an edit summary. I agree with the revert, but giving a level-2 vandalism notice (when there is no level 1) for a good-faith edit is not best practices. Cheers everyone! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kayla MuellerEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Kayla Mueller at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Shhhhwwww!!, this nomination doesn't even have a hook: there's nothing here at all! Please fix this, and also supply a quid pro quo review, which is required for all your nominations. Note that you have earlier nominations, also without QPQ reviews, that are on the verge of being closed as unsuccessful because you haven't done the reviews on them. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
And don't attribute your ideas to me. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:23, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
Final call for a QPQ review. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Current eventsEdit

The IP who keeps reverting you has done this before (see their talk page and this unresolved ANI). I wanted to remind you to be careful not to edit war yourself, and to let you know what you're getting into.

Sorry for your trouble. Remember that WP is usually fun and collaborative and friendly! FourViolas (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning FourViolas. That person is getting on my nerves. It tried to ignore it before but... Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome! I recommend you read WP:MASTODON, and take a brief WP:WikiBreak until the adrenalin surge clears away. It's never a good idea to edit under the influence of psychoactive chemicals, especially the ones your own body produces. FourViolas (talk) 14:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Tom CottonEdit

Hello Shhhhwwww!!,

The source you cited discusses Cotton as a potential 2020 presidential candidate, not 2016. His six year Senate term ends in 2020, and the proposed legislation would allow him to run for re-election to the Senate simultaneous with a presidential run. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015Edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Malaysian, you may be blocked from editing. Wakanebe Wizard (talk) 05:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Murad Ebrahim. Wakanebe Wizard (talk) 05:57, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

dude it says you are retired - I will put to you a simple and well known scenerio - a doctor saves thousands of lives - then one day he says to himself "I dont like that guy," and then kills him - any amount of good works does not justify a free pass for the doctor - you have never been blocked from editing wiki before and yet in the last few days your behavior makes no sense - like adding WP:ADVOCACY material you have begun to do - no one is saying that the trial is irrelevant BUT, like all trials on the current events page we just need to hear about the most major steps and from here on those appear to be (if they happen) the conviction and sentencing--70.190.111.213 (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Legal threatEdit

Please do not restore the legal threat which was removed by the editor who made it. This editor was asked to withdraw their legal threat at WP:ANI and did so as requested under policy. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Noah Galloway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limb. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Kayla MuellerEdit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Mary Jane Veloso) has been reviewed!Edit

Thanks for creating Mary Jane Veloso, Shhhhwwww!!!

Wikipedia editor Roches just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nominated for "Did you know?", the feature list of new articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Roches's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I removed the text you struck out, thinking it was unnecessary. Then I decided to put it back so the DYK reviewer could see it as well as your proposal. The original suggestions I made are still struck out and your proposed text is ALT2, like it was when you added it the first time. (When I erased the struck out text, I changed your text from ALT2 to the first entry.) Roches (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Editor's Barnstar
Mary Jane Veloso, what a sad sad case. It breaks my heart that an innocent that was taken advantage of will be executed. I was considering creating this myself but you did it before me. Hope and pray that god has mercy for her and her family. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Noah GallowayEdit

Harrias talk 17:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rodrigo GularteEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Rodrigo Gularte at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

It has been well over two weeks without a response. The nomination will likely close soon if you do not provide a quid pro quo review. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Mary Jane Veloso has been nominated for Did You KnowEdit

Film article page movesEdit

Hi. Film articles are at their English title per WP:NCF and WP:UE. I think you would be best to go via WP:RM#CM if you wish to move other similar pages ("Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested"). Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marco Archer MoreiraEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Marco Archer Moreira at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Because you habitually nominate articles for DYK while failing to provide QPQ reviews, this nomination will be closed within 48 hours unless a QPQ is provided by then. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of HardhomeEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Hardhome at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Medical sourcing, edit-warringEdit

Hi, please review WP:MEDRS for Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines regarding medical content. Also please stop trying to get content into an article by reverting, several other editors have brought up concerns regarding your proposed content, please gain consensus on the Talk page instead of reverting it in. Zad68 14:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mother's MercyEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Mother's Mercy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 12:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for HardhomeEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mother's MercyEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominationEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/The Dance of Dragons at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 JulyEdit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

PhilWiki Community User GroupEdit

May we invite you to join the Community. Please sign up if you would like to be part of this new User Group. Thank you. --Filipinayzd (talk) 03:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Dance of DragonsEdit

  Hello! Your submission of The Dance of Dragons at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

New issues were raised a few days after your response. Please return if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

WarningEdit

People are getting fed-up with your disruptive page-move nonsense. Just a heads-up, so you aren't surprised if you get blocked. — kwami (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

@Kwamikagami: like moving a page, then moving it right back again? Like they did to Iwa Moto about 80 minutes ago? 220 of Borg 09:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
And again!
Shhhhwwww!! what is the point of moving the page again then moving it back again? To provide edit summaries that you should have provided the first time?
• See Wikipedia:Redirect#How to make a redirect. 220 of Borg 09:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, my bad. Next time. Thanks for the advice. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 09:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
You were asked explicitly not to do this, and yet you have done exactly that at Colonial period of the Philippines and Water supply and sanitation in the Philippines and Brunei Civil War. You are therefore blocked. You may appeal this block in the usual way. DrKay (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kayla MuellerEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kayla Mueller you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kayla MuellerEdit

The article Kayla Mueller you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kayla Mueller for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 04:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kayla MuellerEdit

The article Kayla Mueller you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Kayla Mueller for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Republic of IrelandEdit

Please don't start Requested moves without prior discussion on topics with which you have no previous involvement, as you did at Talk:Republic of Ireland. The question of article names has been very divisive in the past. There was an arbitration case, Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names, and a major poll at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/Poll on Ireland article names that showed a clear consensus among the community in general to keep the current names. The naming convention is stated and explained in the Manual of Style for Ireland-related articles at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Ireland-related articles#Use of Ireland and Republic of Ireland. You would have seen all that if you had just read the heading at the top of the Talk:Republic of Ireland page before jumping in with both feet. Scolaire (talk) 07:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:BurmaEdit

Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Like a Virgin (song)#Requested move 4 August 2015Edit

I recently started a move request. --George Ho (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

"Middle Ages"Edit

Hi. I noticed with some alarm that you've been introducing the term "Middle Ages" to Philippine History articles a lot. I feel very strongly that the use of the term is problematic, potentially obscuring important nuances of early Philippine history. May I invite your participation in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines#Massive_move_of_article_names:_History_of_the_Philippines_.2F_.22Middle_Ages.22 please? Thank you. - Alternativity (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Moved requested moveEdit

I have moved your move request from Talk:Palestine (disambiguation) to Talk:Palestine because the disambiguation move is largely a technical move. The discussion concerns the name of the article primarily. Rob984 (talk) 23:36, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

I reverted it. Apparently it's not as simply as copying and pasting because of the bot. Rob984 (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Establishment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015Edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Philippines. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. See Talk:Philippines#Establishment. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Philippine independence. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. See this revert. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

murder has been moved to sept 1 where it belongs - please work on it thereEdit

again the protests mean nothing they fail notablity but the murders are a story go to sept 1 and tell it--68.231.26.111 (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
fair warning i have brought this edit war of not notable material to the following admin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wtmitchell#https:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fw.2Findex.php.3Ftitle.3DPortal:Current_events.2F2015_September_10.26action.3Dhistory --68.231.26.111 (talk) 05:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015Edit

  This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I have been contacted by another user asking for help re your recent edits at Portal:Current_events/2015_September_10 and other Portal:Current_events articles. A look at your editing history persuades me that you are again (still?) editing WP articles as if you owned them, making changes in a high-handed manner without providing edit summaries, and edit warring. This behavior is disruptive. Please cease this behavior. Provide appropriate edit summaries for your changes and discuss reverted changes on the relevant article article talk pages instead of edit-warring. Continuation of this behavior will result in blocks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Page movesEdit

If you continue to engage in undiscussed and controbersial page moves (Héctor Herrera, amongst others), then you will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. GiantSnowman 09:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Alliance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

ANI noticeEdit

Please see WP:ANI for a discussion relative to your recent moves and move requests. Calidum 23:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I removed your edit to Umpqua Community College ShootingEdit

You recently added information to the description of this shooting event, claiming it was aimed at Christians. I see why you think this is correct. He did, after all, ask about religion. However, this does not seem to be correct given the information we have. If you can find a reliable source from the last week or so claiming this, I will have no issue with it. I normally wouldn't let you know, but since you had the most recent edit, I figured you should know. Again, I have no doubt that this was in good faith. Early signs did point to your description. If you would like to add this information, it probably shouldn't go in the early description until it is more apparent that it is the reason for it. Please don't take this message the wrong way. I'm not calling you out on vandalizing or anything, just please back up your sources. Thanks.Padsquad2010 (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC) Padsquad2010 (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of North Borneo, PhilippinesEdit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as North Borneo, Philippines, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 00:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015Edit

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katietalk 04:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miriam Defensor Santiago presidential campaign, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pablo Garcia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015Edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jamalul Kiram III. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 08:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Jamalul Kiram III, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 10:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015Edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia as you did at February 25, you may be blocked from editing. Quis separabit? 07:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Good Article renominationsEdit

Shhhhwwww!, I was frankly surprised to see that you had renominated both the Mary Jane Veloso and Philippines v. China articles to be Good Articles. As I noted back when you had retired in September and I removed the nominations as abandoned, both articles did not meet the good article criteria at the time, not the least of which were their inadequate lead sections (see WP:LEAD for what is expected).

You should have at least improved the lead sections to meet the criteria before renominating the articles—I notice that this was an issue with your previous GAN, Talk:Kayla Mueller/GA1. However, since you have, you should be aware that both nominations will require significant work on your part to improve the articles if you wish them to be listed, so if you don't have the time (as you didn't with Kayla Mueller), you should probably withdraw them.

One thing: these are renominations—the old nominations were closed—not reinstatements of old nominations, so I have given them a timestamp that reflects your edits earlier today. Best of luck this time if you choose to pursue these nominations. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited APEC Philippines 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ChokoleitEdit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chokoleit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 21:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015Edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jejomar Binay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 07:39, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opinion polling in the Philippine Senate election, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niel Tupas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rodrigo GularteEdit

The article Rodrigo Gularte you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rodrigo Gularte for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Notecardforfree -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Miriam Defensor SantiagoEdit

I undid your move of the page, adding a hyphen to her name. Her own website, as well as several others cited in the article, do not include the hyphen. A previous move (to add the hyphen) was undone in 2006 for essentially these same reasons. If you think the hyphen should be there, please take it up on the article Talk page, and explain why (particularly in light of the disagreement among the sources). Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 18:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I now see that you have had issues in the past with disruptive moves - see this ANI thread, including blocks - and so would add to the foregoing that in any case when you think a move is appropriate, you should first take it to the article Talk page. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Filipino AmericansEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Filipino Americans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of E.M.Gregory -- E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of David v. PoeEdit

  Hello! Your submission of David v. Poe at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 08:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015Edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Catholic Church by country. Elizium23 (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm NebY. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Christianity by country has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NebY (talk) 07:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Protestantism by country. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NebY (talk) 07:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christianity in Asia, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 07:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Grace PoeEdit

Let's discuss. Here are my thoughts. [add'l info added]

"Why is she disqualified" is not extraneous, it's basic. The text of the actual decision apparently hasn't been seen except by "a highly reliable source" who said "the rulings of the en banc are 'nuanced.' News reports based on that, not "best evidence."

Poe has one more avenue to seek redress, the SC, which can't be done until the decision is actually released, à la "it ain't over until the paperwork is done."

The "world" has no idea what's been going on. Don't know about either of Poe's appeals nor what's been in previous news reports. In the US, the natural born citizen issue has impacted two recent presidential candidates, Barrack Obama & Ted Cruz, so at least here (me-Columbia Md.) it's relevant.

Should know more about the Philippines and other nations in East Asia. You do; I'll keep learning.

Please share your thoughts. Thanks. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Will re-edit at 19:30 UTC if no response RaqiwasSushi (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Re-edited. Please do not revert. If think it should change, let's talk RaqiwasSushi (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

You've been reportedEdit

Editing based on "personal image preference" is uncalled for.   There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

January 2016Edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Karylle , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Filipino AmericansEdit

The article Filipino Americans you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Filipino Americans for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of E.M.Gregory -- E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for David v. PoeEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

2016Edit

As per WP:RY anniversaries are specifically excluded from Recent Year articles. If you continue to edit war over this you can expect the appropriate reaction. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Cut and paste moveEdit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Template:Partido ng Demokratikong Reporma-Lapiang Manggagawa/meta/color/meta/color/meta/color a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Template:Partido ng Demokratikong Reporma-Lapiang Manggagawa/meta/color. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, that was WP:Broken.

February 2016Edit

  Hello, I'm Mcmatter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mar Roxas have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

RetirementEdit

Greetings! I hope that, like me, you're enjoying your retirement (playful grin).

If you're getting a bit bored, you might want to comment at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Opinion_polling_in_the_Philippine_presidential_election,_2016&oldid=705421580#Ten_green_bottles on how many bottles are left hanging on the wall... BushelCandle (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick and informative answer over at the article's talk page - you were spot on.
Reading through this talk page of yours there seems to be a lot of negativity. I have a feeling that a lot of people don't understand some of your great edits (like I didn't until you explained it to me). Maybe putting a bit more in the edit summary might help?
When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 
The text written there will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. BushelCandle (talk) 21:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Portal:Current eventsEdit

I reverted your entry at Portal:Current events. No one involved in the robbery claimed to be part of Black Lives Matter. Please refrain from adding bogus information to the Current Events portal. Kaldari (talk) 19:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

About your recent editEdit

  Hello, I'm XCONZ. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person as you did at TG Guingona, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philippine House of Representatives elections, 2016
added a link pointing to Carlos Zarate
Richard J. Gordon
added a link pointing to Statesman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

AN noticeEdit

  This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

BlockedEdit

You have been blocked from editing for 1 month, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Blocked by DrKay. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I have undone the move that this editor had done (without any justification) for the page Water supply and sanitation in the Philippines. It was moved to Hydrology in the Philippines but this made no sense and was not discussed. EvMsmile (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Retired?Edit

Why do you claim to be retired? You have had thousands and thousands of edits in the last few months -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

DYKEdit

  Hello! Your submission of PiliPinas Debates 2016 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 15:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for PiliPinas Debates 2016Edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for PiliPinas Debates 2016 – Mindanao legEdit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016Edit

  This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Jamalul Kiram III, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Molecule Extraction (talk) 15:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Disruption on SabahEdit

Stop creating RfC's for absolutely no reason. It's disruption. Stop adding things and then for no apparent reason striking them out. It's confusing. Stop attacking other editors. If you don't start demonstrating good faith I will take this to AN/I and ask for administrative action.

Follow Wikipedia policy on WP:NPA, WP:RS and WP:NPOV instead. The policies are there because they work. If you disagree or don't understand some of it, ask. --OpenFuture (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

FYIEdit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Arbitration case request declinedEdit

The Infobox for Jamalul Kiram III, Ismael Kiram II, Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to, has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attributionEdit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Liberal Party into Citizens' Action Parties. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

I see by your edit to Beefsteak you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Copying from one article another without providing the required attribution is a copyright violation. Please begin fulfilling this mandatory legal requirement, or you risk being blocked from editing. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion notificationEdit

 

A tag has been placed on Template:Partido ng Masang Pilipino/meta/color, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Anti-establishment wave for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anti-establishment wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-establishment wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 08:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


Grace Poe GA nominationEdit

Shhhhwwww!!, your nomination of Grace Poe to be a Good Article is now the oldest unreviewed article nominated for GA. It could be selected at any time.

The problem here is that the article contains very little on her recent Presidential run. There's a lot on the qualifications controversy, but next to nothing about the campaign or the basic results (probable third place finish). If the review starts with the article in this state, I can't imagine it will pass, and there is a significant risk that the article will be failed out of hand rather than being given time to be brought up to date.

I would advise you to work on updating the article now. In the meantime, I have placed a note on the nomination pointing out that the election was happening on May 9. I will be removing it in a few days. Best of luck in your work. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

TalkbackEdit

Hello, Shhhhwwww!!. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Romblon.
Message added 08:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America1000 08:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Geraldine RomanEdit

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grace PoeEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grace Poe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackJack -- BlackJack (talk) 06:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grace PoeEdit

The article Grace Poe you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Grace Poe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackJack -- BlackJack (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of RomblonEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Romblon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International reactions to Philippines v. China, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Group of 7 and Wang Yi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of rulers of the Philippines for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rulers of the Philippines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rulers of the Philippines until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016Edit

  Hello, I'm Feinoha. I noticed that you recently removed some content from President of the Philippines without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The template your replaced the content with doesn't exist. Feinoha Talk 02:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:President of the Philippines timelineEdit

 Template:President of the Philippines timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Mediran [talk] 10:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016Edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of languages by total number of speakers, you may be blocked from editing. There is no "2016 Edition" and the numbers you added for Tagalog do not match what the source says. Thomas.W talk 14:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Additionally, you have changed numerical values on other pages while either piggybacking your edit on existing citations or not providing any supporting sources at all. Why would an experienced editor do such things? Our readers deserve better service than this. Tiderolls 15:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
(Copied from my user talk) There is no definitive total for the number of speakers of Tagalog language. The 70+ million figure is based on the totals for Tagalog (25 million) and the Tagalog-based Filipino language (45 million) in Ethnologue. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Then you should say that. Instead what you are adding is considered original research. Are you familiar with this concept? Again, our readers deserve information they can verify, not your best calculation. While I am here, why would distributing conversations over several pages be a better idea than having conversations centralized? If one is addressed in on place they should reply there. Tiderolls 16:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The only reliable total is the one in Ethnologue. That's just one source. All the other references are inaccurate (both Philippine or otherwise) because they are either inflated or deflated because they tend to include or ignore bilingual speakers of languages of the Philippines. Most people in the country claim to be multilingual so it is difficult to identify native speakers between second-language speakers. A situation that conflates the numbers. It is further confounded by some people who speak more than one language natively. So having 180 different languages is a challenge for statistics. The easiest solution is to stick to a single trustworthy source (Ethnologue) no matter how flawed it may be. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 19:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm not seeing how any of that mitigates your actions. Stop adding content without proper sourcing. Tiderolls 20:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Qandeel BalochEdit

 On 20 July 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Qandeel Baloch, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

QuestionEdit

Why is my name mentioned here? Grapesoda22 (talk) 01:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

For credit. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016Edit

  Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Portal:Current events/2016 July 31, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. --IJBall (contribstalk) 19:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

July 30 edits in Template:Philippine presidential election, 2016Edit

I'm dumbfounded by your edits on that template on July 30. Please explain. –HTD 02:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Apparently who edited several articles showing this "fact". Again, please explain. –HTD 02:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leni RobredoEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leni Robredo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leni RobredoEdit

The article Leni Robredo you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Leni Robredo for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 11:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

8/31 removal of Philippines/China itemEdit

Why? Can only guess now. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 07:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016Edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. Your assertions that Oprah Winfrey and Kim Il-Sung have been deified are patently ridiculous; no reasonable reading of the sources you cite could even remotely suggest that. Knock it off. Psychonaut (talk) 11:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Leila de LimaEdit

 Template:Leila de Lima has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. RioHondo (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Initial visibility: currently defaults to autocollapse

To set this template's initial visibility, the |state= parameter may be used:

  • |state=collapsed: {{Shhhhwwww!!|state=collapsed}} to show the template collapsed, i.e., hidden apart from its title bar
  • |state=expanded: {{Shhhhwwww!!|state=expanded}} to show the template expanded, i.e., fully visible
  • |state=autocollapse: {{Shhhhwwww!!|state=autocollapse}}
    • shows the template collapsed to the title bar if there is a {{navbar}}, a {{sidebar}}, or some other table on the page with the collapsible attribute
    • shows the template in its expanded state if there are no other collapsible items on the page

If the |state= parameter in the template on this page is not set, the template's initial visibility is taken from the |default= parameter in the Collapsible option template. For the template on this page, that currently evaluates to autocollapse.

TenseEdit

Hi. Please remember to use past tense in your edits! (Sorry to be a Nazi, but I fixed a few of these before, already) zzz ([s[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 17:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

DS Advisement for Portal:Current events/2016 November 9Edit

  This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016Edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at California. Binksternet (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CaliforniaEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article California you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 22:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of CaliforniaEdit

The article California you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:California for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 23:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Shhhhwwww!!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

question about RFCEdit

When you do a RFC do you just put the RFC question in the talk page and the bot puts it in the RFC page (WP:RFC)? Just curious. Lake of Milk (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes.

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Minor barnstar
For your many little edits to Leni Robredo. Bearian (talk) 20:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 DecemberEdit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 17 DecemberEdit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Varieties of EnglishEdit

Please desist from placing English variety tags on articles based on what you feel the English should be. That is not how English variety is chosen on Wikipedia. Instead, it relies on those working on the articles, or through WP:TIES if there is a very strong connection. CMD (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:California EnglishEdit

 Template:California English has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. John from Idegon (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hawaiian EnglishEdit

 Template:Hawaiian English has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fut.Perf. 22:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia articles that use California English has been nominated for discussionEdit

 

Category:Wikipedia articles that use California English, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 22:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia articles that use Hawaiian English has been nominated for discussionEdit

 

Category:Wikipedia articles that use Hawaiian English, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 23:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017Edit

  Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Languages of the Philippines without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 JanuaryEdit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

List of Hispanic and Latino Americans in the United States Congress‎Edit

While I reject the notion held by some that Filipinos cannot be deemed to be "Hispanic" or "Latino," am responsible for adding Manuel Quezón (whose substantial Spanish ancestry was public knowledge during his lifetime) to the List of Hispanic and Latino Americans in the United States Congress‎, and am awaiting corroborating evidence as to the Spanish ancestry of Isauro Gabaldón and Benito Legarda before adding him to the article, it simply is not correct to state that *all* Filipinos meet the definition of either "Hispanic" or "Latino." While a person who was born and raised in, say, Argentina or Mexico would be deemed, ipso facto, to be "Latino," the Philippines are not considered a Latin-American country (due to the fact that the Philippines aren't in the Americas), so for a Filipino to meet the criteria for inclusion in the article he would need, at the very least, to be of substantial Spanish descent (which, in the context of a Filipino, likely would have caused such person to be referred to, at least in the early 20th century, as a "mestizo"). Quezón certainly meets the criteria, and I suspect that Gabaldón and Legarda do as well (if you have any information on their Spanish ancestry, please add it to their Wikipedia pages), but I have no reason to believe that any of the other Resident Commissioners from the Philippines had substantial Spanish ancestry.

The same thing goes for the Delegates from Guam and the Northern Marianas. If any of those Delegates have substantial Spanish ancestry, then I will support you in including them in the article, but otherwise I don't think that they should be included.

Regarding your deletion of the sentence regarding how Chamorros are not Hispanic, I don't know enough about Chamorros to gauge whether they have substantial Spanish ancestry, but I agree that the mere fact that someone is Chamorro should not disqualify him from being deemed a Hispanic.

I deleted your addition of John Ensign, given that he is 1/8 German-Filipino and has very little, if any, Spanish ancestry. I have not deleted any of your other additions, but am certain that few of them involve Hispanics. I recommend that you provide evidence of Spanish ancestry (e.g., mentions in reliable sources that such person was a mestizo) for the persons that you added if you want to avoid having your additions deleted. Believe me, other editors of List of Hispanic and Latino Americans in the United States Congress‎ are quick to delete first and not even wait for an explanation, and you will need evidence to convince them that particular Filipinos and Chamorros belong in the article.

AuH2ORepublican (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

@AuH2ORepublican, All Filipinos born before 1900 were born in the Spanish Empire and spoke Spanish hence are therefore Hispanic. Not all Latin Americans have Spanish ancestry some are 100% native. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit my article at Tagalog WikipediaEdit

Please, edit my article on Tagalog Wikipedia, because it is important. --cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 09:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Portal:Current events/SidebarEdit

Hi. What is the meaning of this edit? Thanks. El_C 07:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

@El_C , They just changed the name of their country. It's okay if you disagree. It's new. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Oh, I see... No, I just didn't know; it looked like gibberish. Sorry about that. El_C 07:19, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Georgia's 6th congressional district special election, 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mountain Park, Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017Edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. e.g. Armenian Americans, Iranian Americans, Georgian Americans, Azerbaijani Americans, Template:Asian Americans. Those were incorrect additions. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC) @LouisAragon, Not all of them are controversial or disputed. A blanket revert was unnecessary. Some Sindhi Americans are Indian Americans as some Tamil Americans are Singaporean Americans. The revert affected all changes controversial or not. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 00:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Template:Asian Americans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

I noticed your recent edit to Filipino American does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

I noticed your recent edit to Filipino Americans does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

hiEdit

Hi Shhhhwwww!!. I'd like to contact you by email to ask about a page you created as part of a research project I am doing. Is that possible? kind regards Doctor 17 (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

@Doctor 17, why? Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 10:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi again...Ive replied on my talk page :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor 17 (talkcontribs) 10:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

{You've got mail} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor 17 (talkcontribs) 04:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Shhhhwwww!! I sent you an email via the link. Hoping you get it. thanks for making it available. Doctor 17 (talk) 03:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Shhhhwwww!! Sorry this doesn't seem to be working but I sent two emails to the address linked to your user account. Is it possible that has been entered incorrectly? Doctor 17 (talk) 05:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthew Pottinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Flynn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

BLP disputeEdit

Don't tell me you also have conflict of interest with Roy Cimatu with the way you switched around and renamed certain sections and removed one sourced paragraph i added. Will keep a close eye on all your edits that have shown a particular bias.--RioHondo (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

RioHondo, this is more about WP:OWNership of articles rather than conflict of interest. Accusing others without good faith is rather a bit naughty.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 02:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
A minor "interestingly spaced" claim does not justify the removal of the Ombudsman decision clearing Cimatu of the charges. And the career section is divided according to agency or office held not according to change in admin. Explain this edit.--RioHondo (talk) 02:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Pardon, RioHondo, none of the said sentences were removed but rather simply reshuffled around the article to give a more chronological feel. The subject matter was out of office during the time of His Exellency Benigno Aquino III so binding his career by office is simply illogical. It seems that someone else has a conflict of interest not the one being accused. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 02:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
RioHondo, Reverting someone and accusing them of vandalism is simply out of good faith. One must be aware that own ership of articles is contrary to the spirit of the encyclopedia. One must be open to the views of others. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 02:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
That's not what the sources say. Cimatu served in the Benigno Aquino III administration as per source, and this 2011 Executive order by President Aquino which extended his term as Special Envoy. You wouldn't even allow a controversy section that links to a scandal in your article on Leila de Lima citing WP:BLP, WP:UNDUE or whathaveyous. That's the problem when you don't check on sources and rely on personal knowledge and biases which you have shown early on.--RioHondo (talk) 02:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
RioHondo, "criticism" or "controversy" sections in any biography are ill-advised because the verge on being attack pages so incorporating them into the body of a biographical article gives a much more neutral. Editors do err but at the same time the subject matter did retire for a time in between the first appointment and the second one in a span of five years so treating these as a single phase is a strech. The insertion of the controversial event within that section may bridge the two phases. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 02:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The sections are there to separate career and education from other details. It's common practice to lump all the details regardless of their chronology to their own place in the article. As with the infobox, it lumps all the terms officials served per position or office, and a person's masterals are under Education regardless if he earned them halfway through his career.But i understand you don't write articles here but just to push a certain agenda like the ownership you made in the drug war article and those of other political opponents of your senator that worked in the same building as you. Just go back to updating pics of ethnic representatives and nominating articles you didn't make to DYK ;).--RioHondo (talk) 03:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
RioHondo, please refrain from personal attacks. It is simply rude and unhelpful. In reaching a consensus. The biggest point of contention in the subject matter's so-called "Pabaon controversy." It is simply an eyesore to the average reader who simply seek to be informed. On a sidenote, one must by clairvoyant to know the location of the other. One must suggest that another must be mindful before making any assumptions. The purpose of an editor is irrelevant to the grander purpose of the encylopedia. Some write articles while others don't but all function in the grander ecosystem of knowledge. One must be open to this. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 03:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I have made the requested adjustments to remove a controversy section. Thanks for nominating my articles to DYK in the past though. We're all good.--RioHondo (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

As an interested bystander, I hope you don't mind me saying that both of you do fine work and I'm glad you were able to finish on a friendlier note and make a constructive change to the structure of the article... BushelCandle (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017Edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Connecticut, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — JJBers 14:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Matthew PottingerEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Matthew Pottinger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

OTD June 12Edit

Thanks for helping out on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/June 12. Just wanted to point out a few things to keep in mind when doing OTD updates:

  1. Let's not have it so that all the blurbs are related to the US.
  2. It's the 75th anniversary for the Anne Frank blurb, so that gets priority being a significant anniversary.
  3. Too many modern items. I normally try to limit it to a max of three 20th century and later items.
  4. We normally wait at least two years (WP:RECENT) to list blurbs, so it's too early for the Pulse nightclub shooting

Please don't let that discourage you from future contributions to OTD. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 20:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017Edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Twofortnights (talk) 14:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

It's never been my experience that these templated warnings generate more light than heat with experienced editors. (Sometimes they're just used as cheap "badges of shame".) I assume this relates to the business about Israeli stamps in passports? If not, it might be best to signal exactly what edits you found unconstructive and why? Just my ha'penny's worth...BushelCandle (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

@BushelCandle +Twofortnights, the problem with the Israeli stamps us that them seem to target specific type of countries: East Asian/West Pacific [China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea (South), Philippines, San Marino, and Thailand], major historically-Catholic countries [Andorra, Brazil, France, Hungary, Mexico, Monaco, Poland, Portugal, and Spain], and some random set of countries [Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Norway, and Serbia]. It explicitly excludes most Anglophone countries except Australia and New Zealand, African countries, Carribean countries, and certain large countries such as India, Italy, and Russia. There seem to be an intrinsic reason why the editor is intent on forewarning people from these countries. That and the statement reamins unsourced which may equate to vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

I found his edit here: [1] to be unnecessary. The page has over three hundred references. Simply asking for more is not constructive behavior. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Power~enwiki , Please ready unsourced. The number of references is irrelevant to the factual accuracy of an article. So long as it contains unsourced statements, the dozens of references may not be enough. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 03:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Power~enwiki: I agree with Shhhhwwww!! in this case, with one caveat: Anything that is "common knowledge" and/or is unlikely to be challenged (For example "Paris is the capital of France") doesn't need to be sourced. In my experience most information on Wikipedia needs references. WhisperToMe (talk) 09:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of My Family's SlaveEdit

  Hello! Your submission of My Family's Slave at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

WIPEdit

If you're creating a work in progress, please use your user sandbox. See: Help:My sandbox. This way others won't disturb your work, and readers won't see incomplete articles. As it stands, the bibliography section on the article is inappropriate. Opencooper (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Opencooper: I think it's a bit long, but the best way to deal with it, IMO, is to have him slowly remove entries by integrating the content from the "further reading" sources into the article. WhisperToMe (talk) 09:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

My Family's SlaveEdit

Thanks for working on this one! I also left some extra sources in the talk page that talk about Pulido's Filipino relatives and how they reacted.

Try to integrate the content from the "further reading" into the article. Each time a source is used, you can remove it from the further reading list. WhisperToMe (talk) 09:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate contentEdit

Hi, you are adding duplicate content on the 2019 G20 Tokyo summit page. See this edit.

Please use the Preview button before submitting changes to verify that your updates are valid and correct. sikander (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer grantedEdit

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Nomination of My Family's Slave for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Family's Slave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Family's Slave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yoninah (talk) 15:15, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Matthew PottingerEdit

 On 6 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matthew Pottinger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Matthew Pottinger, a member of the U.S. National Security Council, was a journalist in China for seven years before becoming a U.S. Marine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Pottinger. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Matthew Pottinger), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for My Family's SlaveEdit

Alex ShihTalk 00:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

:-)Edit

  The Philippine Barnstar of National Merit
I commend your work on topics related to the Philippines, such as Spanish language in the Philippines‎.  
this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~


foreign species invasionEdit

Very creative post. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 00:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

... thanks ...? Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 00:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Portal:Current EventsEdit

Just to let you know, the bot only creates the current events pages the day before that day, so there was probably no need to make all the pages up to October 31. – NixinovaT|C⟩ 04:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Shhhhwwww!!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ITNEdit

Stop your disruption at ITN, or you will be blocked. Stephen 21:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

You've made a real mess at ITN/C. I hope you can clean it up. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Mess broadly rectified, though I would suggest that you acquaint yourself with the guidelines at ITN before returning to the page. Between unexplained votes and attempting to restart a nomination that had no support with a clean slate, it has not been a great day there for you. Stormy clouds (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2018 Inter-Continental Hotel Kabul attackEdit

 On 22 January 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Inter-Continental Hotel Kabul attack, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Shhhhwwww!!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Sandra Torres (disambiguation) for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandra Torres (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Torres (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. King of ♠ 02:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Asenso Manileño listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Asenso Manileño. Since you had some involvement with the Asenso Manileño redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Howard the Duck (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Asenso Manileño for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asenso Manileño is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asenso Manileño until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. feminist (talk) 14:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Shhhhwwww!!".