Talk:Rame, Maker-with-Rame

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Requested move 12 July 2021 edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) NOT MOVED User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Consensus is that the non-standard disambiguation proposed is not an improvement. I note explicitly for the record that Rame, Cornwall is ambiguous (per the article's hatnote) and not an option for a title. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rame, Maker-with-Rame → Rame, east Cornwall – Per Commons:Category talk:Rame, Caradon, use compass direction to avoid tautological disambiguation. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Crouch, Swale: Disambiguating that way would be pretty nonstandard. What's wrong with disambiguating by civil parish, consistent with Rame, Wendron? Lennart97 (talk) 17:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @Lennart97: As was said at the Commons discussion "Maker-with-Rame is a poor disambiguator for Rame. It only tells you where Rame is if you know where Rame is (!) "Rame, southeast Cornwall" would be better. The same go for the WP articles.". However based on this Rame, southeast Cornwall may be a better target. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oppose I see no reason to go against WP:PLACEDAB here. Rame, Maker-with-Rame only tells you where Rame is if you know where Maker-with-Rame is just as Rame, Wendron only tells you where Rame is if you know where Wendron is. I see no problem with either. Lennart97 (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. The proposed title is just horrible. No need for a change. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic