| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editI have been cleaning up this article, but the tone is still not right. Added a warning template. I do not know if this person is notable enough for a Wikipedia entry. gidonb (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC).
Hi Gidonb. First of all thanks for your contributions. I have added citations needed in the text to improve it. About your doubt, I would like to comment you that scientific contributions referenced in the text demonstrated his notability, but I can add other references to improve it; for example references of Scientific Journals as Harvard Educational Review about his contributions; Booknote - Harvard Educational Review, Do you think that I should add this kind of content? Writer28 (talk) 10:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Review
editI have reviewed the article based on the mentioned criteria, and I have also contributed to improve its grammar. Since the content of the article has been improved, I have removed the warning template added by Gidonb.USA2006 (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)