Talk:Rajput Rebellion (1708–1710)

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

India: History

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.
	This article was last assessed in August 2021.

Neutrality dispute edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments3 people in discussion

@SKAG123: Why is this article's neutrality being disputed? Jarble (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Large parts of the article are not in an encyclopedic tone and are written like a story. Lots of weasel words and poorly sourced content in the body. Needs cleanup SKAG123 (talk) 15:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I also fail to understand how the neutrality is being questioned. Do the sources not match the content? Please make points so that we can understand what is wrong and improvise. Ranadhira (talk) 13:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have edited a few sentences that are an example of content not written neutrally. There are a lot more sections in this article than need to be fixed. SKAG123 (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

These changes are fine. However the neutrality itself should not be questioned as everything here is according to the refs that were available. Ranadhira (talk) 03:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic