This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drum Corps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Drum and bugle corps (modern) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Drum CorpsWikipedia:WikiProject Drum CorpsTemplate:WikiProject Drum CorpsDrum Corps articles
This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I have now twice undone recent spurious and uncalled for edits by User:GWFrog. A month ago, he claimed Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps had gone defunct. I called on him to cite it before including it. He wanted to edit-war but finally relented and added what seemed to be halfway toward a cite. I left it at that. This weekend, User:Racine1927, who seems to be connected to the organization, said no, they're still alive, as I suspected all along. User:GWFrog shows up and promptly rewrites User:Racine1927's clean text into unnecessary prose. I undid it. It's not what the member said and it obscures what the member was clearly saying. User:GWFrog looks on the verge of editwarring again. User:GWFrog has no more credibility in this issue, having been caught in an untruth. Instead of rewriting User:Racine1927's text, User:GWFrog should at best apologize to User:Racine1927, and at least drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. There is nothing more for you here except to move on.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
I am going to, one more time, revert your edit to the factually supported text. If you revert it again, I will file a Wikipedia:Dispute resolution request concerning your actively edit warring and violating the three-revert rule.
I tried to be nice, politely explaining to you in detail how my edit was the correct one, but you started swearing in the edit summary and ranting on Talk:Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps. I am not out to engage in an edit war; I am only trying to edit in the proper manner. If you cannot do the same, we will take this situation to the administrators. GWFrog (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments1 person in discussion
Fredref123, facts are what we deal in on Wikipedia, not guesswork. And no, his purple prose is crap. Read Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing#Creative_expression. "did not take the field" could mean they actually showed up and decided not to participate after all. "did not participate in DCI Summer Music Games" leaves no ambiguity or guesswork. There's no "neutrality" in this issue at all. Facts are what we deal with on Wikipedia. If you and GWFrog want to write a blog somewhere, go do that. Not here.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
You know what? Scratch that-you're a ringer he called in. You've made a total of three edits in a year not counting this one. You're a phony.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Sockpuppeteer GWFrog is at it again-clearly you have no shame, luckily I'm monitoring you. You have no business changing wording on this article since I outed you for sockpuppetry. I will continue to out you each time you change the wording of this article to your twisted POV, which is not supported by the citation given.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
