Talk:RVSV-ZEBOV vaccine/Archive 1

recent/J of Infectious disease

• Marzi, Andrea; Hanley, Patrick W.; Haddock, Elaine; Martellaro, Cynthia; Kobinger, Gary; Feldmann, Heinz (15 October 2016). "Efficacy of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus–Ebola Virus Postexposure Treatment in Rhesus Macaques Infected With Ebola Virus Makona". Journal of Infectious Diseases. 214 (suppl 3): S360–S366. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw218. ISSN 0022-1899. Retrieved 18 October 2016...could be interesting(but paywalled will try to find)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Recent publication in The Lancet

• thelancet.com - Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!)
• cnn.com - Ebola vaccine gives 100% protection, study finds

32.217.39.168 (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

[1]per reasons given(assuming your the same ip[2])--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

References

Lead section

Most of the lead should be moved into body. Compare this to now, and... I don't know what else to say. Most recent development should be pushed down to the newest body section, but I can't think of a section title. Maybe "Recent development" or "Recent research"? --George Ho (talk) 08:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

per MEDMOSWikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles(and [3]) lead should reflect what is in body of article--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Maybe you meant MOS:LEAD, Ozzie10aaaa. The page tells us how to introduce readers to the topic, the vaccine to supposedly cure ebola. --George Ho (talk) 11:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

The lead summarizes the body per LEAD. It does that now. Jytdog (talk) 11:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

• The lead should be a concise summaryWikipedia:Manual_of_Style..(WP LEAD is fine as well)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Okay... I am close to trusting your efforts. However, the lead replicates or copies what some of the body says. I don't see much of a summary. The first paragraph is seen already in "Medical use" section. The third paragraph is not in the body; so do some or fewer sentences in the second. --George Ho (talk) 12:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Yup nothing wrong with the lead containing key aspects of the body work for work. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I'll rephrase: most of the sentences in the lead are identical to the ones in the body. The first paragraph is almost identical to the "Medical use" section, for example. --George Ho (talk) 10:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Name

How do we get a lower case "r"? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Figured it out. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Effectiveness

Once a medication / vaccine comes into use a discussion of effectiveness IMO should be under "medical use" not "history". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

This is a primary source and is not a reliable for this content making medical claims. We don't do this. Jytdog (talk) 19:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

I have provided a review, here. Jytdog (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks User:Jytdog. Looks good Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)