Talk:RINF

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RINF article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on August 31, 2014. The result of the discussion was delete.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This was deleted in 2014, recreated in 2015, tagged as non-notable, then the tag removed by an IP. The subject appears to be a blog or aggregator that used to collect stories by a few conspiracy-theory authors. It is mentioned in passing once in a single Guardian article. Amateur website Media Bias/Factcheck calls it a questionable source.[1] No corporate contact info on the site, only a gmail address. Delete. —Michael Z. 03:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic