Talk:Różan

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2601:5CC:8301:5430:65F6:DF6A:B08C:9814 in topic Problematic source

Problematic source edit

The blatant antisemitism of that sourcing tag is troubling. How is the number of people lost in the Holocaust "controversial"? That encyclopedia is likely the only source for this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CC:8301:5430:65F6:DF6A:B08C:9814 (talk) 02:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yizkor books are not very reliable. This was discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_90#Primary_sources_as_references. The basic claims about Jewish community are probably accurate, but this type of source is not good for any controversial claims; see also Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism_in_Poland#Article_sourcing_expectations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


The problematic source is you. You have a long history of defending and giving platform to Polish nationalist antisemitism on here. Strzembosz and Nowak never seem to bother you, but you've taken it upon yourself to vandalize pages to airbrush the Holocaust in Poland. What's controversial about the facts other than that you find them inconvenient?

2601:585:8200:F310:94AB:237E:EFDB:F025 (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

:2601:585:8200:F310:94AB:237E:EFDB:F025|2601:585:8200:F310:94AB:237E:EFDB:F025 you need be careful more with your words, discuss content here. Piotrus, why you making false claims on source? It not Yizkor book, but translation of Yad Vashem's Pinkas haKehilot encyclopedia. I add 2nd source, Museum of the Jewish People at Beit Hatfutsot, says similar. Nothing controversial in content or sources.--KasiaNL (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC) (banned sock puppet - [1] GizzyCatBella🍁 19:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply