Comments edit

Reads like a marketing piece (detailed comparison of storage within current product line, describing underlying OS as using "widely used proven technology", etc.)

Is it acceptable to leave the com

Removing the two main product-lines edit

The company has almost all the time split it's products in two main product-lines: the KBox1000 for application management (+helpdesk functionality) and the KBox 2000 for OS deployment. That within these two main lines the individual products are removed is -imho- defendable, but to remove the two main product-lines is -again imho- an overreaction. Tonkie (talk) 19:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of product lines edit

In the past WhiWaWiz deleted all mentioned product/series-numbers and I could very well live with that. Since then it was replaced by the two or three quite static main product-lines that include entirely different systems, but apparently someone though again to delete that without giving any good reason why (at least imho). As said: I fully agree that Wikipedia shouldn't be a list of available models, submodels and features. But if you can't mention the main product lines that are completely different products it is like deleting Windows Server, Exchange and XBox from the Microsoft page as it is all computers..... Tonkie (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dell KACE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply