This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An additional transliteration into Cyrillic Mongolian is okay, but the text should basically be given in non-conventionalized transcription from Middle Mongolian. That is, you may not even follow Damdinsuren when doing so but have to rely on the facsimiles. Else, I'm not sure whether this article establishes its relevance for Wikipedia (though I'd say that it is relevant), and I may point to the infavourable ratio between explaining text and source text. Anyway, thank you for this new article! G Purevdorj (talk) 07:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
Was the original written in Mongolian script, Phagspa script, or yet some other script? I assume the supposedly original text in this wp article is just the text as given by Damdinsuren, so it might be not completely the same as the text of the "original" original. Unfortunately the link to the picture of the original doesn't work. Yaan (talk) 10:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Guess this is the original, so problem solved. Yaan (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
And actually the answer is already in the first sentence of the article. O dear. Yaan (talk) 10:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
