Merge with Pompeii edit

Most of this page is about the history of the Roman city before the eruption, and this is overlapping with the Pompeii page. There does not seem very much to tell about the modern city. I think these articles should be merged, or at least all the Roman history should be moved there. Andreas Kaganov 14:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree, or at least the pre-eruption material should be moved to Pompeii, trimming this article down to just describing the modern city (while still noting that it used to be Pompeii, of course). I'd be fine with having two articles, one for each time period, as long as they're clearly differentiated. For example, we have separate articles for Istanbul, Constantinople, and Byzantium, even though they're just different stages of evolution of the same city. -kotra (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Strongly disagree with Andreas Kaganov on the merge, Pompei with one "i" is the modern day administrative city entity; it has articles in seven different languages. Pompeii note the two i's, listed by UNESCO as a World Heritige Site isr talk:Gennarous|talk]]) 06:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

If the current article is really about the modern city, then shouldn't all the spellings reflect that? I see many double-i spellings that are not referring to the ancient city. I'm going to be bold and fix it, but if anyone objects, please make the changes you feel necessary. Thanks! WesT (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Turns out the only misspelling was in the Info Box. Easy fix. WesT (talk) 16:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Santuario Pompei 01 - Esterni.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Santuario Pompei 01 - Esterni.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Santuario Pompei 01 - Esterni.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Campanile Pompei 08 - Vs Vesuvio.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Campanile Pompei 08 - Vs Vesuvio.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Campanile Pompei 08 - Vs Vesuvio.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Population Graph edit

The population over time graph is difficult to read and is formatted strangely on the page. Someone more experienced than I should fix this TreboniusArtorius (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply