Talk:Politehnica University of Bucharest

Article name

i changed the name from "Universitatea Politehnica Bucureşti" to "Universitatea POLITEHNICA din Bucureşti" because that is the propper way to spell it. look at the stamps from official documents. see here http://www.pub.ro/romana/despreupb/index.html ... it's mentioned as "Universitatea POLITEHNICA din Bucuresti" this is the official and propper way to spell the university's name. i feel it should be spelled as such here too. GringoCroco 20:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I changed it back. I see no point in capitalising the name~. Mihai -^talk 16:45, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

It's not for you to see a point. It's the standardised way of spelling the name. and the full name contains the "din" part too. if it really bugs you that the name is capitalised, at least leave it complete as: "Universitatea POLITEHNICA din Bucuresti". And please give me a reason why it shouldn't be capitalised. Give me a solid reason and I'll stop modifying this as I know it is correct (I indeeed may be wrong, but as far as I know it I am not). Cheers, GringoCroco 20:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Actualy I've checked my diploma and I've seen it is written Politehnica with Bolded lettres but the same is for the MINISTRY OF EDUCATION IN ROMANIA and the same for the FACULTY NAME and ROMANIA. Also I've searched around Wikipedia and I've failed to see a university name which is not an abreviation to be writtten with capitalised lettres. Beside this, you can see that it is an inconsecvence on the website related to the name being written with CAPITALISED lettres only on pages describing its statute. Otherwise it is used the noncapitalised version of the name. I have failed to find a page about the name where it is written clearly that the name should be capitalised. If you can find it on the www.pub.ro website I'll be grateful, until then, Isee no point in overephasising the name by capitalising it. Mihai -^talk 21:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Not the capitalization is the (only) problem... you basically translated a proper name - Politehnica is a proper name, so with or without capitalization, the official name should be University Politehnica of Bucharest (as written in http://www.pub.ro/English/eng.htm). Bogdantudor 20:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, the correct english name is Politehnica University of Bucharest (hence pub). - Alexandru —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.85.0.116 (talk) 21:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Shouldn't then the name be Politehnica University of Bucharest? Or maybe "Politehnica" University of Bucharest, to emphasize the proper name. Mihai Capotă (talk) 18:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved to Politehnica University of Bucharest --Aervanath (talk) 05:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

---

Polytechnic University of Bucharest → Politehnica University of Bucharest — "Politehnica" is used as a proper name in the original title, "Universitatea Politehnica din Bucureşti" --Mihai Capotă 10:18, 27 January 20

Is "polytechnic" the English translation of "politehnica"? If so, why would you translate "university" "of" and "Bucharest" but not "polytechic"? Station1 (talk) 21:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Because "Politehnica" is a proper noun, not an adjective in the original title. If it were, it would have been spelled "Politehnică", i.e. without the article. It used to be that way in the old title, "Institutul Politehnic Bucureşti". Mihai Capotă (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I do not speak Romanian, but if I understand correctly you are saying "politehnic" or "politehnică" (with a diacritic) is the translation of "polytechic" but "Politehnica" could be only a proper noun in Romanian. If that is the case I understand your reason for requesting a move. I do notice a Google search for "Polytechnic University of Bucharest" yields many hits, so that name is often used, perhaps wrongly, in English. I have no opinion on the move, as long as whichever name is not used redirects to the other. Station1 (talk) 00:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti logo.png

Image:Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti logo.png

Image:Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Politehnica University of Bucharest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090629045708/http://www.agir.ro/univers-ingineresc/din_istoria_ingineriei_rom_nesti_1819.html to http://www.agir.ro/univers-ingineresc/din_istoria_ingineriei_rom_nesti_1819.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20040627074720/http://www.universulenergiei.educatia.ro/istorie/politehnica/1948-1992/ to http://www.universulenergiei.educatia.ro/istorie/politehnica/1948-1992/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)