Talk:Phase-locked loop range

Proposed merge with Phase-locked loop

The multiple names and vague definitions for this concept make me question whether this is worth an article in its own right Derek Andrews (talk) 14:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

I am still working on this article. Precise mathematical definitions will be added soon. Marat Yuldashev 14:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maratyv (talk • contribs)

I've added links from Phase-locked_loop#Performance_parameters to this page --Marat Yuldashev 13:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maratyv (talk • contribs)

Perhaps this is a valid sub-topic article, per WP:Summary style, if it goes into too much detail for the main Phase-locked loop article. Wbm1058 (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I agree. Maratyv Marat Yuldashev 11:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I think perhaps the wrong merge tag was used -- you aren't proposing that Phase locked loop be merged into Phase-locked loop ranges, but rather the other way around, correct? Because Phase locked loop should be the main article. Air ♠ Combat _What's^{up, dog?} 21:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

as an electrical engineer I agree with merging articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasi73.ra (talk • contribs) 09:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Closing given that no clear consensus for a merge over 2 years; while the last statement is in support, there is no argument presented for the merge other than a statement of expert opinion. Earlier commentators have objected. Klbrain (talk) 21:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)