Talk:Plamen Goranov

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plamen Goranov article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Restored the Plamen Goranev article content

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are lots of cited sources, including foreign ones. This guy has acquired for many Bulgarians especially, but others as well, the status of Czech Jan Palach. Paavo273 (talk) 03:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notability

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

'Have added cited material which easily establishes notability under general WP standard WP:Notability: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." This subject has received big coverage in English media, and I have barely touched foreign, especially Bulgarian media. "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." There's no doubt even from the English-language sources I've just cited that this subject has entered the Bulgarian public consciousness and acquired a Jan-Palach-like status in Bulgaria. Paavo273 (talk) 07:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo anybody?

Does anyone have a copyright-free photo of the man to contribute to this article? It would be much appreciated!

Re anonymous removal of source-cited material

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Absent some WP rule I am not aware of, the basis for removing the material with three cited sources appears to be nonsense, most likely simple vandalism, albeit vandalism NOT without an ulterior motive.

AFAICT, the only issue may be whether the source qualifies for use on WP, which IMHO all three clearly DO.

Nevertheless, ASSUMING your owning the URL gives you the right to remove the URL as a source--which seems extremely doubtful, it seems even LESS likely you own the URL to the New York Times AND the Vienna Review AND the Sofia News. (To go way out on a limb, assuming you can cite a WP rule that allows you to control the use of a URL that qualifies as a valid WP source, you should remove ONLY the URL you have the right to remove, and ADD a need citation tag if applicable.)

This to-date single-edit contributor's IP address is based in Bulgaria. Paavo273 (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic